A Randomized Trial of a Multifactorial Strategy to Prevent Serious Fall Injuries
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Injuries from falls are major contributors to complications and death in older adults. Despite evidence from efficacy trials that many falls can be prevented, rates of falls resulting in injury have not declined. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention that included risk assessment and individualized plans, administered by specially trained nurses, to prevent fall injuries. A total of 86 primary care practices across 10 health care systems were randomly assigned to the intervention or to enhanced usual care (the control) (43 practices each). The participants were community-dwelling adults, 70 years of age or older, who were at increased risk for fall injuries. The primary outcome, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, was the first serious fall injury, adjudicated with the use of participant report, electronic health records, and claims data. We hypothesized that the event rate would be lower by 20% in the intervention group than in the control group. RESULTS: The demographic and baseline characteristics of the participants were similar in the intervention group (2802 participants) and the control group (2649 participants); the mean age was 80 years, and 62.0% of the participants were women. The rate of a first adjudicated serious fall injury did not differ significantly between the groups, as assessed in a time-to-first-event analysis (events per 100 person-years of follow-up, 4.9 in the intervention group and 5.3 in the control group; hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.06; P = 0.25). The rate of a first participant-reported fall injury was 25.6 events per 100 person-years of follow-up in the intervention group and 28.6 events per 100 person-years of follow-up in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.99; P = 0.004). The rates of hospitalization or death were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A multifactorial intervention, administered by nurses, did not result in a significantly lower rate of a first adjudicated serious fall injury than enhanced usual care. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and others; STRIDE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02475850.).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The STRIDE Trial did not reduce fall rates at all compared to usual care in 5451 adults of mean age 80, followed up to 44 months.
“For example, the largest multifactorial falls prevention program ever published, the STRIDE Trial [483] did not reduce fall rates at all compared to usual care in 5451 adults of mean age 80, followed up to 44 months.”
From Global consensus on optimal exercise recommendations for enhancing healthy longevity in older adults (ICFSR) (2025) · cites this paper as [483]
The STRIDE Trial did not reduce fall rates compared to usual care in 5451 adults of mean age 80, followed up to 44 months.
“For example, the largest multifactorial falls prevention program ever published, the STRIDE Trial [483] did not reduce fall rates at all compared to usual care in 5451 adults of mean age 80, followed up to 44 months.”
From Global consensus on optimal exercise recommendations for enhancing healthy longevity in older adults (ICFSR) (2025) · cites this paper as [483]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 228
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [1]Health, United States, 2016: with chartbook on long-term trends in health. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 5 2017. 28910066
- [35]Guirguis-Blake JM, Michael YL, Perdue LA, Interventions to prevent falls in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 4 2018. 30234932
- Authors
- Bhasin, S., Gill, T. M., Reuben, D. B., Latham, N. K., Ganz, D. A., Greene, E. J., Dziura, J., Basaria, S., Gurwitz, J. H., Dykes, P. C., McMahon, S., Storer, T. W., Gazarian, P., Miller, M. E., Travison, T. G., Esserman, D., Carnie, M. B., Goehring, L., Fagan, M., Greenspan, S. L., Alexander, N., Wiggins, J., Ko, F., Siu, A. L., Volpi, E., Wu, A. W., Rich, J., Waring, S. C., Wallace, R. B., Casteel, C., Resnick, N. M., Magaziner, J., Charpentier, P., Lu, C., Araujo, K., Rajeevan, H., Meng, C., Allore, H., Brawley, B. F., Eder, R., McGloin, J. M., Skokos, E. A., Duncan, P. W., Baker, D., Boult, C., Correa-de-Araujo, R., & Peduzzi, P.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- From the Boston Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, Research Program in Men’s Health: Aging and Metabolism (S. Bhasin, N.K.L., S. Basaria, T.W.S., T.G.T., L.G., B.F.B., R.E.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital (S. Bhasin, N.K.L., S. Basaria, P.C.D., T.W.S., T.G.T., P.G., M.B.C., L.G., B.F.B., R.E.), Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Harvard Medical School (T.G.T.), and the University of Massachusetts Boston (P.G.), Boston, and Meyers Primary Care Institute (joint...
- ORCID
- Bhasin, Shalender
- Gill, Thomas M.
- Reuben, David B.
- Latham, Nancy K.
- Ganz, David A.
- Greene, Erich J.
- Basaria, Shehzad
- Gurwitz, Jerry H.
- Dykes, Patricia C.
- McMahon, Siobhan
- Storer, Thomas W.
- Gazarian, Priscilla
- Miller, Michael E.
- Travison, Thomas G.
- Esserman, Denise
- Carnie, Martha B.
- Alexander, Neil
- Ko, Fred
- Siu, Albert L.
- Volpi, Elena
- Wu, Albert W.
- Rich, Jeremy
- Waring, Stephen C.
- Wallace, Robert B.
- Casteel, Carri
- Resnick, Neil M.
- Magaziner, Jay
- Charpentier, Peter
- Rajeevan, Haseena
- Meng, Can
- Allore, Heather
- Brawley, Brooke F.
- Duncan, Pamela W.
- Boult, Chad
- Peduzzi, Peter
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2020-07-09
- Volume
- 383
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-140
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- PMC
- PMC7421468
- OpenAlex
- W3041356767
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 57.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (5U01AG048270)
- National Institute on Aging (5U01AG048270)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
- Keywords
- fall prevention, fall-related injuries, older adults, multifactorial intervention, fall risk assessment, primary care, community-dwelling older adults, hospitalization, mortality, STRIDE trial, health care system, health care costs, health care utilization
- MeSH terms
- Accidental Falls, Accidental Injuries, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Patient Care Management, Risk Factors, Incidence, Risk Assessment, Independent Living, Precision Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review