Cited by 298Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchNatural Compounds in Disease Treatment

Trial of Upadacitinib or Abatacept in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rubbert-Roth, Andrea, Enejosa, Jeffrey, Pangan, Aileen L., Haraoui, Boulos, Rischmueller, Maureen, Khan, Nasser, Zhang, Ying, Martin, Naomi +1 more·2020·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background Upadacitinib is an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor to treat rheumatoid arthritis. The efficacy and safety of upadacitinib as compared with abatacept, a T-cell costimulation modulator, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are unclear. Methods In this 24-week, phase 3, double-blind, controlled trial, we randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral upadacitinib (15 mg once daily) or intravenous abatacept, each in combination with stable synthetic DMARDs. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the composite Disease Activity Score for 28 joints based on the C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP; range, 0 to 9.4, with higher scores indicating more disease activity) at week 12, assessed for noninferiority. Key secondary end points at week 12 were the superiority of upadacitinib over abatacept in the change from baseline in the DAS28-CRP and the percentage of patients having clinical remission according to a DAS28-CRP of less than 2.6. Results A total of 303 patients received upadacitinib, and 309 patients received abatacept. From baseline DAS28-CRP values of 5.70 in the upadacitinib group and 5.88 in the abatacept group, the mean change at week 12 was -2.52 and -2.00, respectively (difference, -0.52 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.69 to -0.35; P Conclusions In patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic DMARDs, upadacitinib was superior to abatacep…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2008250

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 26 · Cited by 298

Authors
Rubbert-Roth, A., Enejosa, J., Pangan, A. L., Haraoui, B., Rischmueller, M., Khan, N., Zhang, Y., Martin, N., & Xavier, R. M.
Affiliations
  • From the Division of Rheumatology, Cantonal Clinic St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland (A.R.-R.); AbbVie, North Chicago, IL (J.E., A.L.P., N.K., Y.Z., N.M.); Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal (B.H.); Queen Elizabeth Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia (M.R.); and Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil (R.M.X.).
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2020-10-15
Volume
383
Issue
16
Pages
1511-1521
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3092992115
Cited by
298
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 4
FWCI
29.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
AbbVie
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Natural Compounds in Disease Treatment
Keywords
upadacitinib, abatacept, rheumatoid arthritis, JAK inhibitors, non-inferiority, disease activity, clinical remission, synthetic DMARDs, adverse events, venous thromboembolism, stroke, drug safety
MeSH terms
Abatacept, Janus Kinase Inhibitors, Administration, Oral, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, C-Reactive Protein, Double-Blind Method, Drug Tolerance, Female, Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Male, Middle Aged, Remission Induction, Antirheumatic Agents, Intention to Treat Analysis, Inducible T-Cell Co-Stimulator Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review