Efficacy of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine at Completion of Blinded Phase
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: At interim analysis in a phase 3, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial, the mRNA-1273 vaccine showed 94.1% efficacy in preventing coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). After emergency use of the vaccine was authorized, the protocol was amended to include an open-label phase. Final analyses of efficacy and safety data from the blinded phase of the trial are reported. METHODS: We enrolled volunteers who were at high risk for Covid-19 or its complications; participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two intramuscular injections of mRNA-1273 (100 μg) or placebo, 28 days apart, at 99 centers across the United States. The primary end point was prevention of Covid-19 illness with onset at least 14 days after the second injection in participants who had not previously been infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The data cutoff date was March 26, 2021. RESULTS: The trial enrolled 30,415 participants; 15,209 were assigned to receive the mRNA-1273 vaccine, and 15,206 to receive placebo. More than 96% of participants received both injections, 2.3% had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline, and the median follow-up was 5.3 months in the blinded phase. Vaccine efficacy in preventing Covid-19 illness was 93.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.0 to 94.8), with 55 confirmed cases in the mRNA-1273 group (9.6 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 7.2 to 12.5) and 744 in the placebo group (136.6 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 127.0 to 146.8). The efficacy in preventing severe disease was 98.2% (95% CI, 92.8 to 99.6), with 2 cases in the mRNA-1273 group and 106 in the placebo group, and the efficacy in preventing asymptomatic infection starting 14 days after the second injection was 63.0% (95% CI, 56.6 to 68.5), with 214 cases in the mRNA-1273 group and 498 in the placebo group. Vaccine efficacy was consistent across ethnic and racial groups, age groups, and participants with coexisting conditions. No safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The mRNA-1273 vaccine continued to be efficacious in preventing Covid-19 illness and severe disease at more than 5 months, with an acceptable safety profile, and protection against asymptomatic infection was observed. (Funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; COVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04470427.).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 641
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [17]17. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED, Kitchin N, et al. Six month safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. July 28, 2021 (https://www . medrxiv . org/ content/ 10 . 1101/ 2021 . 07 . 28 . 21261159v1). preprint.
- [26]26. Hadjadj J, Planas D, Ouedrani A, et al. Immunogenicity of BNT162b2 vaccine against the alpha and delta variants in immunocompromised patients. August 9, 2021 (https://www . medrxiv . org/ content/ 10 . 1101/ 2021 . 08 . 08 . 21261766v1). preprint. Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.
- Authors
- El Sahly, H. M., Baden, L. R., Essink, B., Doblecki-Lewis, S., Martin, J. M., Anderson, E. J., Campbell, T. B., Clark, J., Jackson, L. A., Fichtenbaum, C. J., Zervos, M., Rankin, B., Eder, F., Feldman, G., Kennelly, C., Han-Conrad, L., Levin, M., Neuzil, K. M., Corey, L., Gilbert, P., Janes, H., Follmann, D., Marovich, M., Polakowski, L., Mascola, J. R., Ledgerwood, J. E., Graham, B. S., August, A., Clouting, H., Deng, W., Han, S., Leav, B., Manzo, D., Pajon, R., Schödel, F., Tomassini, J. E., Zhou, H., & Miller, J.
- Affiliations
- From Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (H.M.E.S.), and Javara, The Woodlands (C.K.) — both in Texas; Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston (L.R.B.), and Moderna, Cambridge (A.A., H.C., W.D., S.H., B.L., D.M., R.P., F.S., J.E.T., H.Z., J.M.) — both in Massachusetts; Meridian Clinical Research, Baton Rouge, LA (B.E., F.E.); University of Miami, Miami (S.D.-L.), and DeLand Clinical Research Unit, DeLand (B.R.) — both in Florida; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (J.M.M.); Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (E.J.A.); University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (T.B.C.); University of California, Los Angeles (J.C.), and Wake Research–Medical Center for Clinical Research, San Diego (L.H.-C.) — both in California; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (L.A.J.), and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (L.C., P.G., H.J.) — both in Seattle; University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati (C.J.F.); Henry Ford Health System, Detroit (M.Z.); Vitalink Research, Greenville,...
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Baden, Lindsey R.
- ORCID
- El Sahly, Hana M.
- Baden, Lindsey R.
- Essink, Brandon
- Martin, Judith M.
- Anderson, Evan J.
- Campbell, Thomas B.
- Clark, Jesse
- Jackson, Lisa A.
- Fichtenbaum, Carl J.
- Zervos, Marcus
- Feldman, Gregory
- Neuzil, Kathleen M.
- Corey, Lawrence
- Gilbert, Peter
- Janes, Holly
- Follmann, Dean
- Marovich, Mary
- Polakowski, Laura
- Mascola, John R.
- Ledgerwood, Julie E.
- Graham, Barney S.
- August, Allison
- Deng, Weiping
- Leav, Brett
- Schödel, Florian
- Tomassini, Joanne E.
- Miller, Jacqueline
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2021-11-04
- Volume
- 385
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1774-1785
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- PMC
- PMC8482810
- OpenAlex
- W3199784607
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 129 · 2022: 236 · 2021: 91
- FWCI
- 43.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (contract 75A50120C00034)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (UM1 AI 68614; UM1 AI 68635; UM1 AI 68618;UM1 AI 68)
- Moderna
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Keywords
- mRNA-1273 vaccine, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, mRNA vaccines, severe COVID-19 prevention, vulnerable populations, emergency use authorization, vaccine safety, SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection, vaccine hesitancy
- MeSH terms
- Immunogenicity, Vaccine, COVID-19, COVID-19 Vaccines, 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunization, Secondary, Male, Middle Aged, Incidence, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Intention to Treat Analysis, Patient Acuity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review