CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,825Lung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neoadjuvant Nivolumab plus Chemotherapy in Resectable Lung Cancer

Open access
Forde, Patrick M., Spicer, Jonathan, Lu, Shun, Provencio, Mariano, Mitsudomi, Tetsuya, Awad, Mark M., Felip, Enriqueta, Broderick, Stephen R., Brahmer, Julie R., Swanson, Scott J., Kerr, Keith, Wang, Changli, Ciuleanu, Tudor-Eliade, Saylors, Gene B., Tanaka, Fumihiro, Ito, Hiroyuki, Chen, Ke-Neng, Liberman, Moishe, Vokes, Everett E., Taube, Janis M., Dorange, Cecile, Cai, Junliang, Fiore, Joseph, Jarkowski, Anthony, Balli, David, Sausen, Mark, Pandya, Dimple, Calvet, Christophe Y., Girard, Nicolas·2022·New England Journal of Medicine
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2202170PMC PMC9844511
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy confers a modest benefit over surgery alone for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In early-phase trials, nivolumab-based neoadjuvant regimens have shown promising clinical activity; however, data from phase 3 trials are needed to confirm these findings. METHODS: In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with stage IB to IIIA resectable NSCLC to receive nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy or platinum-based chemotherapy alone, followed by resection. The primary end points were event-free survival and pathological complete response (0% viable tumor in resected lung and lymph nodes), both evaluated by blinded independent review. Overall survival was a key secondary end point. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. RESULTS: The median event-free survival was 31.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.2 to not reached) with nivolumab plus chemotherapy and 20.8 months (95% CI, 14.0 to 26.7) with chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio for disease progression, disease recurrence, or death, 0.63; 97.38% CI, 0.43 to 0.91; P = 0.005). The percentage of patients with a pathological complete response was 24.0% (95% CI, 18.0 to 31.0) and 2.2% (95% CI, 0.6 to 5.6), respectively (odds ratio, 13.94; 99% CI, 3.49 to 55.75; P<0.001). Results for event-free survival and pathological complete response across most subgroups favored nivolumab plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone. At the first prespecified interim analysis, the hazard ratio for death was 0.57 (99.67% CI, 0.30 to 1.07) and did not meet the criterion for significance. Of the patients who underwent randomization, 83.2% of those in the nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy group and 75.4% of those in the chemotherapy-alone group underwent surgery. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33.5% of the patients in the nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy group and in 36.9% of those in the chemotherapy-alone group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resectable NSCLC, neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in significantly longer event-free survival and a higher percentage of patients with a pathological complete response than chemotherapy alone. The addition of nivolumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase the incidence of adverse events or impede the feasibility of surgery. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; CheckMate 816 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02998528.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2202170

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Forde, P. M., Spicer, J., Lu, S., Provencio, M., Mitsudomi, T., Awad, M. M., Felip, E., Broderick, S. R., Brahmer, J. R., Swanson, S. J., Kerr, K., Wang, C., Ciuleanu, T.-E., Saylors, G. B., Tanaka, F., Ito, H., Chen, K.-N., Liberman, M., Vokes, E. E., Taube, J. M., Dorange, C., Cai, J., Fiore, J., Jarkowski, A., Balli, D., Sausen, M., Pandya, D., Calvet, C. Y., & Girard, N.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • From the Bloomberg–Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore (P.M.F., S.R.B., J.R.B., J.M.T.); McGill University Health Center (J.S.), and Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (M.L.) — both in Montreal; Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai (S.L.), Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin (C.W.), and Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing (K.-N.C.) — all in China; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid (M.P.); Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama (T.M.), the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu (F.T.), and Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama (H.I.) — all in Japan; Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (M.M.A., S.J.S.); Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona (E.F.); Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom (K.K.); Institutul Oncologic Prof. Dr....
ORCID
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society
Published
2022-05-26
Volume
386
Issue
21
Pages
1973-1985
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
DOI
10.1056/nejmoa2202170
PMC
PMC9844511
OpenAlex
W4223502512
Cited by
2,825
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 583 · 2025: 683 · 2024: 724 · 2023: 624 · 2022: 209
FWCI
361.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.nejmgroup.org/legal/terms-of-use.htm (vor)
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Bristol-Myers Squibb (N/A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
nivolumab, neoadjuvant therapy, non-small cell lung cancer, resectable lung cancer, platinum-based chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, event-free survival, pathological complete response, overall survival, treatment-related adverse events
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Platinum Compounds, Neoadjuvant Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review