Cited by 966Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Trial of Antisense Oligonucleotide Tofersen for SOD1 ALS

Open access
Miller, Timothy M., Cudkowicz, Merit E., Genge, Angela, Shaw, Pamela J., Sobue, Gen, Bucelli, Robert C., Chiò, Adriano, Van Damme, Philip +18 more·2022·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: ALS). METHODS: ALS in a 2:1 ratio to receive eight doses of tofersen (100 mg) or placebo over a period of 24 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline to week 28 in the total score on the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R; range, 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating better function) among participants predicted to have faster-progressing disease. Secondary end points included changes in the total concentration of SOD1 protein in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), in the concentration of neurofilament light chains in plasma, in slow vital capacity, and in handheld dynamometry in 16 muscles. A combined analysis of the randomized component of the trial and its open-label extension at 52 weeks compared the results in participants who started tofersen at trial entry (early-start cohort) with those in participants who switched from placebo to the drug at week 28 (delayed-start cohort). RESULTS: A total of 72 participants received tofersen (39 predicted to have faster progression), and 36 received placebo (21 predicted to have faster progression). Tofersen led to greater reductions in concentrations of SOD1 in CSF and of neurofilament light chains in plasma than placebo. In the faster-progression subgroup (primary analysis), the change to week 28 in the ALSFRS-R score was -6.98 with tofersen and -8.14 with placebo (difference, 1.2 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.2 to 5.5; P = 0.97). Results for secondary clinical end points did not differ significantly between the two groups. A total of 95 participants (88%) entered the open-label extension. At 52 weeks, the change in the ALSFRS-R score was -6.0 in the early-start cohort and -9.5 in the delayed-start cohort (difference, 3.5 points; 95% CI, 0.4 to 6.7); non-multiplicity-adjusted differences favoring early-start tofersen were seen for other end points. Lumbar puncture-related adverse events were common. Neurologic serious adverse events occurred in 7% of tofersen recipients. CONCLUSIONS: ALS, tofersen reduced concentrations of SOD1 in CSF and of neurofilament light chains in plasma over 28 weeks but did not improve clinical end points and was associated with adverse events. The potential effects of earlier as compared with delayed initiation of tofersen are being further evaluated in the extension phase. (Funded by Biogen; VALOR and OLE ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02623699 and NCT03070119; EudraCT numbers, 2015-004098-33 and 2016-003225-41.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2204705

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most common therapeutic route for CSF drug delivery is intrathecal administration into the lumbar cistern.

    “The CSF has several access points for drug delivery, the most common therapeutic route being intrathecal administration into the lumbar cistern.”

    From Elucidating brain transport pathways and cell type-dependent gene silencing of a durable lipid–siRNA conjugate administered into cerebrospinal fluid (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Trial Design section says tofersen was delivered by intrathecal injection through a lumbar puncture, supporting this route as an example of therapeutic CSF drug delivery. It does not say that this is the most common route, identify the lumbar cistern specifically, or compare CSF access points. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several ASO therapies targeting genes in the spinal cord provide clinical benefit after intrathecal administration; Spinraza and Tofersen have extended survival for patients with spinal muscular atrophy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, respectively.

    “Notably, several ASO therapies targeting genes in the spinal cord provide clinical benefit after intrathecal administration; Spinraza and Tofersen have extended survival for patients with spinal muscular atrophy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, respectively [43,51].”

    From Elucidating brain transport pathways and cell type-dependent gene silencing of a durable lipid–siRNA conjugate administered into cerebrospinal fluid (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several ASO therapies targeting genes in the spinal cord provide clinical benefit after intrathecal administration, with Spinraza and Tofersen extending survival in SMA and ALS patients.

    “Notably, several ASO therapies targeting genes in the spinal cord provide clinical benefit after intrathecal administration; Spinraza and Tofersen have extended survival for patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, respectively.5,6”

    From Lipid-siRNA conjugate accesses a perivascular transport mechanism and achieves widespread and durable knockdown in the central nervous system (2024) · cites this paper as [6]

    The trial description (p. 1100) confirms that tofersen is an intrathecally administered ASO studied in adults with SOD1 ALS. The combined VALOR and open-label extension analysis (p. 1104) reports a lower hazard of death for early-start than delayed-start participants, but says median survival could not be estimated because there were few events; this does not establish that tofersen extended survival for ALS patients generally. This paper does not address Spinraza or SMA. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Bunton-Stasyshyn RK, Saccon RA, Fratta P, Fisher EM. SOD1 function and its implications for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis pathology: new and renascent themes. Neuroscientist 2015; 21: 519-29.
  2. Müller K, Brenner D, Weydt P, et al. Comprehensive analysis of the mutation spectrum in 301 German ALS families. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2018; 89: 817-27.
  3. Huai J, Zhang Z. Structural properties and interaction partners of familial ALS- associated SOD1 mutants. Front Neurol 2019; 10: 527.
  4. Bali T, Self W, Liu J, et al. Defining SOD1 ALS natural history to guide thera- peutic clinical trial design. J Neurol Neu- rosurg Psychiat r y 2017; 88: 99-105.
  5. Hayashi Y, Homma K, Ichijo H. SOD1 in neurotoxicity and its controversial roles in SOD1 mutation-negative ALS. Adv Biol Regul 2016; 60: 95-104.
  6. Coppedè F, Stoccoro A, Mosca L, et al. Increase in DNA methylation in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis carri- ers of not fully penetrant SOD1 muta- tions. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Fronto- temporal Degener 2018; 19: 93-101.
  7. Ekhtiari Bidhendi E, Bergh J, Zetter- ström P, et al. Mutant superoxide dis- mutase aggregates from human spinal cord transmit amyotrophic lateral sclero- sis. Acta Neuropathol 2018; 136: 939-53.
  8. Ilieva H, Polymenidou M, Cleveland DW. Non-cell autonomous toxicity in neu- rodegenerative disorders: ALS and beyond. J Cell Biol 2009; 187: 761-72.
  9. Saccon RA, Bunton-Stasyshyn RK, Fisher EM, Fratta P. Is SOD1 loss of func- tion involved in amyotrophic lateral scle- rosis? Brain 2013; 136: 2342-58.
  10. Sau D, De Biasi S, Vitellaro-Zuccarello L, et al. Mutation of SOD1 in ALS: a gain of a loss of function. Hum Mol Genet 2007; 16: 1604-18.
  11. Rinaldi C, Wood MJA. Antisense oli- gonucleotides: the next frontier for treat- ment of neurological disorders. Nat Rev Neurol 2018; 14: 9-21.
  12. Smith RA, Miller TM, Yamanaka K, et al. Antisense oligonucleotide therapy for neurodegenerative disease. J Clin In- vest 2006; 116: 2290-6.
  13. Abu-Rumeileh S, Vacchiano V, Zene- sini C, et al. Diagnostic-prognostic value and electrophysiological correlates of CSF biomarkers of neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol 2020; 267: 1699- 708.
  14. Benatar M, Zhang L, Wang L, et al. Validation of serum neurofilaments as prognostic and potential pharmacody- namic biomarkers for ALS. Neurology 2020; 95(1): e59-e69.
  15. De Schaepdryver M, Lunetta C, Tarla- rini C, et al. Neurofilament light chain and C reactive protein explored as predic- tors of survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020; 91: 436-7.
  16. Gaiani A, Martinelli I, Bello L, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: neurofila- ment light chain levels in definite sub- types of disease. JAMA Neurol 2017; 74: 525-32.
  17. Lu CH, Macdonald-Wallis C, Gray E, et al. Neurofilament light chain: a prog- nostic biomarker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 2015; 84: 2247-57.
  18. Poesen K, Van Damme P. Diagnostic and prognostic performance of neurofila- ments in ALS. Front Neurol 2019; 9: 1167.
  19. Steinacker P, Feneberg E, Weishaupt J, et al. Neurofilaments in the diagnosis of motoneuron diseases: a prospective study on 455 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psy- chiatry 2016; 87: 12-20.
  20. Verde F, Steinacker P, Weishaupt JH, et al. Neurofilament light chain in serum for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2019; 90: 157-64.
  21. Benatar M, Wuu J, Andersen PM, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-con- trolled trial of arimoclomol in rapidly progressive SOD1 ALS. Neurology 2018; 90(7): e565-e574.
  22. Ludolph AC, Dorst J, Dreyhaupt J, et al. Effect of high-caloric nutrition on surviv- al in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2020; 87: 206-16.
  23. Ludolph AC, Schuster J, Dorst J, et al. Safety and efficacy of rasagiline as an add-on therapy to riluzole in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a random- ised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 681-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, T. M., Cudkowicz, M. E., Genge, A., Shaw, P. J., Sobue, G., Bucelli, R. C., Chiò, A., Van Damme, P., Ludolph, A. C., Glass, J. D., Andrews, J. A., Babu, S., Benatar, M., McDermott, C. J., Cochrane, T., Chary, S., Chew, S., Zhu, H., Wu, F., Nestorov, I., Graham, D., Sun, P., McNeill, M., Fanning, L., Ferguson, T. A., & Fradette, S.
Affiliations
  • From the Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (T.M.M., R.C.B.); the Sean M. Healey and AMG Center for ALS, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (M.E.C., S.B.), and Biogen, Cambridge (T.C., S. Chary, S. Chew, H.Z., F.W., I.N., D.G., P.S., L.F., T.A.F., S.F.) — both in Massachusetts; Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal (A.G.); the Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre and Clinical Research Facility, University of Sheffield and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield (P.J.S., C.J.M.), and Biogen, Maidenhead (M.M.) — both in the United Kingdom; Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan (G.S.); the University of Turin, Turin, Italy (A.C.); KU Leuven, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (P.V.D.); the University of Ulm, Ulm, and Deutsches Zentrum für Neuro...
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2022-09-22
Volume
387
Issue
12
Pages
1099-1110
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4296698991
Cited by
966
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 257 · 2025: 269 · 2024: 269 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 18 · 2019: 1
FWCI
93.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
Funders
Biogen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
tofersen, antisense oligonucleotides, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, SOD1, neurofilament light chain, ALSFRS-R, disease progression, neurological adverse events, open-label extension, muscle strength, vital capacity, biomarkers
MeSH terms
Superoxide Dismutase-1, Adult, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Injections, Spinal, Oligonucleotides, Biomarkers, Oligonucleotides, Antisense, Neurofilament Proteins, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review