Cited by 411CAR-T cell therapy researchMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

GPRC5D-Targeted CAR T Cells for Myeloma

Open access
Mailankody, Sham, Devlin, Sean M., Landa, Jonathan, Nath, Karthik, Diamonte, Claudia, Carstens, Elizabeth J., Russo, Douglas, Auclair, Romany +30 more·2022·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have generated responses in patients with advanced myeloma, but relapses are common. G protein-coupled receptor, class C, group 5, member D (GPRC5D) has been identified as an immunotherapeutic target in multiple myeloma. Preclinical studies have shown the efficacy of GPRC5D-targeted CAR T cells, including activity in a BCMA antigen escape model. METHODS: In this phase 1 dose-escalation study, we administered a GPRC5D-targeted CAR T-cell therapy (MCARH109) at four dose levels to patients with heavily pretreated multiple myeloma, including patients with relapse after BCMA CAR T-cell therapy. RESULTS: cells. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study of a GPRC5D-targeted CAR T-cell therapy (MCARH109) confirm that GPRC5D is an active immunotherapeutic target in multiple myeloma. (Funded by Juno Therapeutics/Bristol Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04555551.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2209900

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These results confirm that GPRC5D is an active immunotherapeutic target in multiple myeloma.

    “The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia (94%), thrombocytopenia (65%), and anemia (35%), which confirm that GPRC5D is an active immunotherapeutic target in multiple myeloma [229, 254].”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [229]

    The Results section (Safety and Maximum Tolerated Dose) reports the cited rates of grade 3 or higher neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. The Abstract Conclusions explicitly say the study confirms GPRC5D as an active immunotherapeutic target, but the paper attributes those hematologic adverse events primarily to lymphodepleting chemotherapy; it does not present the adverse events as what confirms the target’s activity. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CAR-T cells targeting GPRC5D, CD19, CD38, CD138, CS1, and NKG2D are under exploration for MM treatment.

    “Several CAR-T cells targeting antigens, such an GPRC5D [229–231], CD19 [232, 233], CD38 [234–236], CD138 [237], CS1 [238–240] and NKG2D [241, 242] are also under exploration for their efficacy in MM treatment.”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [229]

  • The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events with MCARH109 included neutropenia (94%), thrombocytopenia (65%), and anemia (35%).

    “The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia (94%), thrombocytopenia (65%), and anemia (35%), which confirm that GPRC5D is an active immunotherapeutic target in multiple myeloma [229, 254].”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [229]

  • In the phase 1 trial of MCARH109, a response was reported in 71% (12/17) of the entire cohort of RRMM patients.

    “Among the patients who received MCARH109 therapy, a response was reported in 71% (12/17) of the entire cohort.”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [229]

  • 35% (6/17) achieved a CR, while 59% (10/17) achieved VGPR or better.

    “Of the total patients, 35% (6/17) achieved a CR, while 59% (10/17) achieved VGPR or better.”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [229]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [1]Shah UA, Mailankody S. Emerging immunotherapies in multiple myeloma. BMJ 2020; 370:m 3176. 32958461
  2. [4]Martin T, Usmani SZ, Berdeja JG, Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, an anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE-1 2-year follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2022 June 4 (Epub ahead of print). PMC9937098 35658469
  3. [5]Chong EA, Ruella M, Schuster SJ. Five-year outcomes for refractory B-cell lymphomas with CAR T-cell therapy. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 673– 4. 33596362
  4. [7]Neelapu SS, Locke FL, Bartlett NL, Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 2531– 44. 29226797 PMC5882485
  5. [8]Maude SL, Laetsch TW, Buechner J, Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 439– 48. 29385370 PMC5996391
  6. [12]Atamaniuk J, Gleiss A, Porpaczy E, Overexpression of G protein-coupled receptor 5D in the bone marrow is associated with poor prognosis in patients with multiple myeloma. Eur J Clin Invest 2012; 42: 9 53– 60. 22591013
  7. [13]Lee DW, Santomasso BD, Locke FL, ASTCT consensus grading for cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicity associated with immune effector cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019; 25: 625– 38. 30592986 PMC12180426
  8. [14]Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17(8): e328– e346. 27511158
  9. [15]Roshal M, Flores-Montero JA, Gao Q, MRD detection in multiple myeloma: comparison between MSKCC 10-color single-tube and EuroFlow 8-color 2-tube methods. Blood Adv 2017; 1: 728– 32. 29296716 PMC5728052
  10. [18]Hawrylycz MJ, Lein ES, Guillozet-Bongaarts AL, An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature 2012; 489: 391– 9. 22996553 PMC4243026
  11. [21]Van Oekelen O, Aleman A, Upadhyaya B, Neurocognitive and hypokinetic movement disorder with features of parkinsonism after BCMA-targeting CAR-T cell therapy. Nat Med 2021; 27: 2099– 103. 34893771 PMC8678323

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mailankody, S., Devlin, S. M., Landa, J., Nath, K., Diamonte, C., Carstens, E. J., Russo, D., Auclair, R., Fitzgerald, L., Cadzin, B., Wang, X., Sikder, D., Senechal, B., Bermudez, V. P., Purdon, T. J., Hosszu, K., McAvoy, D. P., Farzana, T., Mead, E., Wilcox, J. A., Santomasso, B. D., Shah, G. L., Shah, U. A., Korde, N., Lesokhin, A., Tan, C. R., Hultcrantz, M., Hassoun, H., Roshal, M., Sen, F., Dogan, A., Landgren, O., Giralt, S. A., Park, J. H., Usmani, S. Z., Rivière, I., Brentjens, R. J., & Smith, E. L.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • From the Myeloma Service (S.M., U.A.S., N.K., A.L., C.R.T., M.H., H.H., O.L., S.Z.U.), the Cellular Therapy Service (S.M., K.N., L.F., B.C., T.F., G.L.S., A.L., S.A.G., J.H.P., S.Z.U.), the Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service (G.L.S., S.A.G.), and the Leukemia Service (J.H.P.), Department of Medicine, the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.M.D.), Radiology (J.L.), and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (R.A., M.R., F.S., A.D.), the Cell Therapy and Cell Engineering Facility (X.W., D.S., B.S., V.P.B., I.R.), the Center for Cell Engineering and the Molecular Pharmacology Program (X.W., I.R.), and the Departments of Pediatrics (K.H., D.P.M.), Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (E.M., S.Z.U.), and Neurology (J.A.W., B.D.S.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College (S.M., G.L.S., U.A.S., N.K., A.L., C.R.T., M.H., H.H., S.A.G., J.H.P., S.Z.U.), New York, and the Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center...
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2022-09-29
Volume
387
Issue
13
Pages
1196-1206
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4297519419
Cited by
411
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
36.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • National Cancer Institute (P30 CA008748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
GPRC5D, multiple myeloma, CAR T-cell therapy, BCMA, relapsed multiple myeloma, dose escalation, immunotherapy targets
MeSH terms
Receptors, Chimeric Antigen, Cytokine Release Syndrome, Humans, Multiple Myeloma, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, T-Lymphocytes, Immunotherapy, Adoptive, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, B-Cell Maturation Antigen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review