Cited by 194Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Baricitinib and β-cell function in patients with new-onset type 1 diabetes

Waibel, Michaela, Wentworth, John M., So, Michelle, Couper, Jennifer J., Cameron, Fergus J., MacIsaac, Richard J., Atlas, Gabby, Gorelik, Alexandra +13 more·2023·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including baricitinib, block cytokine signaling and are effective disease-modifying treatments for several autoimmune diseases. Whether baricitinib preserves β-cell function in type 1 diabetes is unclear. Methods In this phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients with type 1 diabetes diagnosed during the previous 100 days to receive baricitinib (4 mg once per day) or matched placebo orally for 48 weeks. The primary outcome was the mean C-peptide level, determined from the area under the concentration-time curve, during a 2-hour mixed-meal tolerance test at week 48. Secondary outcomes included the change from baseline in the glycated hemoglobin level, the daily insulin dose, and measures of glycemic control assessed with the use of continuous glucose monitoring. Results A total of 91 patients received baricitinib (60 patients) or placebo (31 patients). The median of the mixed-meal-stimulated mean C-peptide level at week 48 was 0.65 nmol per liter per minute (interquartile range, 0.31 to 0.82) in the baricitinib group and 0.43 nmol per liter per minute (interquartile range, 0.13 to 0.63) in the placebo group (P = 0.001). The mean daily insulin dose at 48 weeks was 0.41 U per kilogram of body weight per day (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.48) in the baricitinib group and 0.52 U per kilogram per day (95% CI, 0.44 to 0.60) in the placebo group. The levels of glycated hemoglobin were similar i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2306691

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with teplizumab, some other immunotherapies not only preserve residual β-cell function, but also reduce insulin requirements and improve glycaemic control, without significant adverse events.

    “Compared with teplizumab, some of these therapies not only preserve residual βcell function, but also reduce insulin requirements and improve glycaemic control, without significant adverse events (table 1).”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [23]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 43 · Cited by 194

Authors
Waibel, M., Wentworth, J. M., So, M., Couper, J. J., Cameron, F. J., MacIsaac, R. J., Atlas, G., Gorelik, A., Litwak, S., Sanz-Villanueva, L., Trivedi, P., Ahmed, S., Martin, F. J., Doyle, M. E., Harbison, J. E., Hall, C., Krishnamurthy, B., Colman, P. G., Harrison, L. C., Thomas, H. E., & Kay, T. W. H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • From St. Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research (M.W., M.S., S.L., L.S.-V., P.T., M.E.D., C.H., B.K., H.E.T., T.W.H.K.), St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne (R.J.M., B.K., T.W.H.K.), and the Department of Medicine at St. Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne (R.J.M., L.S.-V., M.E.D., B.K., H.E.T., T.W.H.K.), Fitzroy, the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (J.M.W., P.G.C., L.C.H.), the Departments of Medical Biology (J.M.W., L.C.H.) and Medicine (A.G.), University of Melbourne, the Royal Melbourne Hospital (J.M.W., M.S., C.H., P.G.C., L.C.H.), the Royal Children’s Hospital (F.J.C., G.A.), and the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute (F.J.C.), Parkville, and the School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne (A.G.), VIC, and Women’s and Children’s Hospital (J.J.C., J.E.H.) and the University of Adelaide (J.J.C.), Adelaide, SA — all in Australia; the New York Stem Cell Foundation, New York (S.A.); and Macromoltek, Austin, TX (F.J.M.).
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2023-12-07
Volume
389
Issue
23
Pages
2140-2150
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4389376234
Cited by
194
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 3
FWCI
32.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1150425)
  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International (4-SRA-2020-912-M-B)
  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Australia (4-SRA-2020-912-M-B)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
baricitinib, type 1 diabetes, recent-onset type 1 diabetes, beta-cell function, JAK inhibitors, C-peptide, mixed meal tolerance test, glycemic variability, insulin dose, HbA1c, continuous glucose monitoring, disease-modifying therapy, cytokine signaling inhibition, autoimmune disease therapy, adverse events, safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics
MeSH terms
Janus Kinase Inhibitors, Australia, Azetidines, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Double-Blind Method, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Insulin, Purines, Pyrazoles, Sulfonamides, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Insulin-Secreting Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review