Cited by 286Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Microsatellite-Instability–High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

André, Thierry, Elez, Elena, Van Cutsem, Eric, Jensen, Lars Henrik, Bennouna, Jaafar, Mendez, Guillermo, Schenker, Michael, de la Fouchardiere, Christelle +19 more·2024·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer have poor outcomes with standard chemotherapy with or without targeted therapies. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab has shown clinical benefit in nonrandomized studies of MSI-H or dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: In this phase 3 open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer and MSI-H or dMMR status according to local testing to receive, in a 2:2:1 ratio, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab alone, or chemotherapy with or without targeted therapies. The dual primary end points, assessed in patients with centrally confirmed MSI-H or dMMR status, were progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with chemotherapy as first-line therapy and progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with nivolumab alone in patients regardless of previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease. At this prespecified interim analysis, the first primary end point (involving nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs. chemotherapy) was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 303 patients who had not previously received systemic treatment for metastatic disease were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy; 255 patients had centrally confirmed MSI-H or dMMR tumors. At a median follow-up of 31.5 months (range, 6.1 to 48.4), progression-free survival outcomes (the primary analysis) were significantly better with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy (P<0.001 for the between-group difference in progression-free survival, calculated with the use of a two-sided stratified log-rank test); 24-month progression-free survival was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64 to 79) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with 14% (95% CI, 6 to 25) with chemotherapy. At 24 months, the restricted mean survival time was 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 12.9) longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy, a finding consistent with the primary analysis of progression-free survival. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 23% of the patients in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group and in 48% of the patients in the chemotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Progression-free survival was longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy among patients who had not previously received systemic treatment for MSI-H or dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 8HW ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04008030.).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2402141

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 286

Authors
André, T., Elez, E., Van Cutsem, E., Jensen, L. H., Bennouna, J., Mendez, G., Schenker, M., de la Fouchardiere, C., Limon, M. L., Yoshino, T., Li, J., Lenz, H.-J., Manzano Mozo, J. L., Tortora, G., Garcia-Carbonero, R., Dahan, L., Chalabi, M., Joshi, R., Goekkurt, E., Braghiroli, M. I., Cil, T., Cela, E., Chen, T., Lei, M., Dixon, M., Abdullaev, S., & Lonardi, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • From Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938, and SIRIC CURAMUS, Paris (T.A.), Hopital Foch, Suresnes (J.B.), and Institut Paoli-Calmettes (C.F.), and La Timone, Aix Marseille Université (L.D.), Marseille — all in France; Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona (E.E.), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (M.L.L.), Institut Català d’Oncologia, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona (J.L.M.M.), and Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Imas12, Medicine Department–UCM, Madrid (R.G.-C.) — all in Spain; University Hospitals Gasthuisberg and University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium (E.V.C.); the University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle Hospital, Vejle (L.H.J.); Hospital Universitario Fundacion Favaloro, Buenos Aires (G.M.); Centrul de Oncologie Sf Nectarie, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); the National Cancer Center Hospi...
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2024-11-28
Volume
391
Issue
21
Pages
2014-2026
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4404784379
Cited by
286
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 155 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 1
FWCI
48.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bristol Myers Squibb (N/A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
nivolumab, ipilimumab, metastatic colorectal cancer, microsatellite instability-high, mismatch repair deficiency, immune checkpoint inhibitors, combination immunotherapy, progression-free survival, first-line therapy, chemotherapy comparison, treatment-related adverse events, immune-related adverse events, restricted mean survival time, predictive biomarkers, PD-1, CTLA-4
MeSH terms
Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Progression-Free Survival, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Colorectal Neoplasms, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Microsatellite Instability, DNA Mismatch Repair, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review