Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 458

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Amivantamab plus Lazertinib in Previously Untreated EGFR -Mutated Advanced NSCLC

Open access
Cho, Byoung C., Lu, Shun, Felip, Enriqueta, Spira, Alexander I., Girard, Nicolas, Lee, Jong-Seok, Lee, Se-Hoon, Ostapenko, Yurii, Danchaivijitr, Pongwut, Liu, Baogang, Alip, Adlinda, Korbenfeld, Ernesto, Mourão Dias, Josiane, Besse, Benjamin, Lee, Ki-Hyeong, Xiong, Hailin, How, Soon-Hin, Cheng, Ying, Chang, Gee-Chen, Yoshioka, Hiroshige, Yang, James C.-H., Thomas, Michael, Nguyen, Danny, Ou, Sai-Hong I., Mukhedkar, Sanjay, Prabhash, Kumar, D’Arcangelo, Manolo, Alatorre-Alexander, Jorge, Vázquez Limón, Juan C., Alves, Sara, Stroyakovskiy, Daniil, Peregudova, Marina, Şendur, Mehmet A.N., Yazici, Ozan, Califano, Raffaele, Gutiérrez Calderón, Vanesa, de Marinis, Filippo, Passaro, Antonio, Kim, Sang-We, Gadgeel, Shirish M., Xie, John, Sun, Tao, Martinez, Melissa, Ennis, Mariah, Fennema, Elizabeth, Daksh, Mahesh, Millington, Dawn, Leconte, Isabelle, Iwasawa, Ryota, Lorenzini, Patricia, Baig, Mahadi, Shah, Sujay, Bauml, Joshua M., Shreeve, S. Martin, Sethi, Seema, Knoblauch, Roland E., Hayashi, Hidetoshi·2024·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background Amivantamab plus lazertinib (amivantamab–lazertinib) has shown clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity in patients with previously untreated or osimertinib-pretreated EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)–mutated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods In a phase 3, international, randomized trial, we assigned, in a 2:2:1 ratio, patients with previously untreated EGFR -mutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R), locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC to receive amivantamab–lazertinib (in an open-label fashion), osimertinib (in a blinded fashion), or lazertinib (in a blinded fashion, to assess the contribution of treatment components). The primary end point was progression-free survival in the amivantamab–lazertinib group as compared with the osimertinib group, as assessed by blinded independent central review. Research Summary Amivantamab–Lazertinib in EGFR -Mutated Lung Cancer Results Overall, 1074 patients underwent randomization (429 to amivantamab–lazertinib, 429 to osimertinib, and 216 to lazertinib). The median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the amivantamab–lazertinib group than in the osimertinib group (23.7 vs. 16.6 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.85; P<0.001). An objective response was observed in 86% of the patients (95% CI, 83 to 89) in the amivantamab–lazertinib group and in 85% of those (95% CI, 81 to 88) in the osimertinib group; among patients with a confirmed response (336 in the amivantamab–lazertinib group and 314 in the osimertinib group), the median response duration was 25.8 months (95% CI, 20.1 to could not be estimated) and 16.8 months (95% CI, 14.8 to 18.5), respectively. In a planned interim overall survival analysis of amivantamab–lazertinib as compared with osimertinib, the hazard ratio for death was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.05). Predominant adverse events were EGFR -related toxic effects. The incidence of discontinuation of all agents due to treatment-related adverse events was 10% with amivantamab–lazertinib and 3% with osimertinib. Conclusions Amivantamab–lazertinib showed superior efficacy to osimertinib as first-line treatment in EGFR -mutated advanced NSCLC. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MARIPOSA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04487080 .)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2403614

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 458

Metadata

Authors
Cho, B. C., Lu, S., Felip, E., Spira, A. I., Girard, N., Lee, J.-S., Lee, S.-H., Ostapenko, Y., Danchaivijitr, P., Liu, B., Alip, A., Korbenfeld, E., Mourão Dias, J., Besse, B., Lee, K.-H., Xiong, H., How, S.-H., Cheng, Y., Chang, G.-C., Yoshioka, H., Yang, J. C.-H., Thomas, M., Nguyen, D., Ou, S.-H. I., Mukhedkar, S., Prabhash, K., D’Arcangelo, M., Alatorre-Alexander, J., Vázquez Limón, J. C., Alves, S., Stroyakovskiy, D., Peregudova, M., Şendur, M. A. N., Yazici, O., Califano, R., Gutiérrez Calderón, V., de Marinis, F., Passaro, A., Kim, S.-W., Gadgeel, S. M., Xie, J., Sun, T., Martinez, M., Ennis, M., Fennema, E., Daksh, M., Millington, D., Leconte, I., Iwasawa, R., Lorenzini, P., Baig, M., Shah, S., Bauml, J. M., Shreeve, S. M., Sethi, S., Knoblauch, R. E., & Hayashi, H.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2024-10-24
Volume
391
Issue
16
Pages
1486-1498
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4400029774
Cited by
458
References
29
FWCI
116.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amivantamab plus Lazertinib in Previously Untreated EGFR -Mutated Advanced NSCLC. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa2403614
The paper
Cho, B. C., Lu, S., Felip, E., Spira, A. I., Girard, N., Lee, J.-S., Lee, S.-H., Ostapenko, Y., Danchaivijitr, P., Liu, B., Alip, A., Korbenfeld, E., Mourão Dias, J., Besse, B., Lee, K.-H., Xiong, H., How, S.-H., Cheng, Y., Chang, G.-C., . . . Hayashi, H. (2024). Amivantamab plus Lazertinib in Previously Untreated EGFR -Mutated Advanced NSCLC. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2403614

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.