Cited by 84Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disordersCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Survival of transplanted allogeneic beta cells with no immunosuppression

Carlsson, Per-Ola, Hu, Xiaomeng, Scholz, Hanne, Ingvast, Sofie, Lundgren, Torbjörn, Scholz, Tim, Eriksson, Olof, Liss, Per +4 more·2025·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The need to suppress a patient's immune system after the transplantation of allogeneic cells is associated with wide-ranging side effects. We report the outcomes of transplantation of genetically modified allogeneic donor islet cells into a man with long-standing type 1 diabetes. We used clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein 12b (Cas12b) editing and lentiviral transduction to genetically edit the cells to avoid rejection; the cells were then transplanted into the participant's forearm muscle. He did not receive any immunosuppressive drugs and, at 12 weeks after transplantation, showed no immune response against the gene-edited cells. C-peptide measurements showed stable and glucose-responsive insulin secretion. A total of four adverse events occurred, none of which were serious or related to the study drug. (Funded by the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust; EudraCT number, 2023-507988-19-00; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT06239636.).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2503822

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 6-month results of the first patient were reported as showing a small amount of ongoing C-peptide production without any immunosuppression.

    “The 6month results of the first patient were reported as showing a small amount of ongoing Cpeptide production without any immunosuppression.77”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [77]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 24 · Cited by 84

Authors
Carlsson, P.-O., Hu, X., Scholz, H., Ingvast, S., Lundgren, T., Scholz, T., Eriksson, O., Liss, P., Yu, D., Deuse, T., Korsgren, O., & Schrepfer, S.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Sana Biotechnology (United States) (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2025-09-04
Volume
393
Issue
9
Pages
887-894
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4412930202
Cited by
84
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 18
FWCI
79.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, lentiviral transduction, immunosuppression-free transplantation, xenotransplantation, C-peptide, glucose-dependent insulin secretion
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Adult, C-Peptide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Graft Rejection, Graft Survival, Humans, Insulin, Male, Transplantation, Homologous, Islets of Langerhans Transplantation, Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic, Insulin-Secreting Cells, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review