Placebo-Controlled Trials of Covid-19 Vaccines - Why We Still Need Them.
Abstract
e2(1) R ecent announcements that some Covid-19 vaccines are estimated to have high short-term efficacy provide new hope that vaccination will soon contribute to controlling the pandemic.The initial roll-out of limited quantities of vaccines that are still investigational will provide the opportunity to ethically obtain pivotal data to improve regulatory and public health decision making, thereby increasing public and professional confidence in these and other vaccines.After relatively short follow-up in phase 3 trials, even when vaccine efficacy appears to be high, reliable information will still be needed on longer-term safety and duration of protection.Other information gaps will include more comprehensive assessments of short-term safety, knowledge of whether waning of vaccineinduced protection may lead to vaccine-enhanced disease if a vaccinee becomes infected on ex-posure to SARS-CoV-2, information on protection against clinically severe forms of Covid-19, and knowledge of any associations between the degree of protection and the recipient's age or coexisting conditions.Even after the first vaccines become available, it will still be important to evaluate additional vaccines to meet worldwide needs. 1 On November 6, 2020, we, as participants in a World Health Organization (WHO) ad hoc consultation on the next steps for Covid-19 vaccine evaluation, discussed what critical additional data should be sought to inform regulatory and policy recommendations for the first succes…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As effective vaccines are deployed, large phase III efficacy trials will become increasingly difficult because of ethical issues with placebo controls when an effective vaccine exists and because disease incidence is falling in countries using vaccines.
“As effective vaccines are gradually rolled out, conducting large phase III efficacy trials will become increasingly difficult — for many reasons, including the ethical issues of a placebo-controlled trial in the context of an effective vaccine being available and also the likelihood of decreasing disease incidence in countries where vaccines are being used — which are usually the same countries”
From Immunological mechanisms of vaccine-induced protection against COVID-19 in humans (2021) · cites this paper as [105]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 4 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- WHO Ad Hoc Expert Group on the Next Steps for Covid-19 Vaccine Evaluation
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Corresponding author
- WHO Ad Hoc Expert Group on the Next Steps for Covid-19 Vaccine Evaluation
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2021-01-14
- Volume
- 384
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e2
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W3106869271
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- World Health Organization
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Keywords
- COVID-19 vaccines, vaccine efficacy, vaccine safety, duration of protection, waning immunity, vaccine-enhanced disease, SARS-CoV-2, vaccine evaluation, regulatory decision-making, vaccine hesitancy
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19 Vaccines, Humans, Placebos, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review