The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dysfunction of the Diaphragm
Open accessAbstract
As many as 20% of extubated patients require reintubation (ie, extubation failure) within 72 hours of extubation, with the exact prevalence depending on numerous factors. The pathophysiologic basis of extubation failure is often different from the cause of weaning failure. Extubation failure substantially prolongs the duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay, and substantially increases hospital mortality. Therefore, prediction of extubation outcome and prevention of extubation failure may be critically important. Unfortunately, standard weaning tests have not proven sufficiently accurate in predicting extubation outcome. New semi-objective measurements of cough strength and secretion volume can help identify patients at increased risk for extubation failure. It is important to note that mortality increases with reintubation delay, which indicates that clinical worsening may take place during the period without ventilatory support. Therefore, improved outcome may derive from rapid identification of patients at increased risk, followed by expeditious reinstitution of ventilatory support when extubation failure occurs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Goligher, E. C., Laghi, F., Detsky, M. E., Farias, P., Murray, A., Brace, D., Brochard, L. J., Sebastien-Bolz, S., Rubenfeld, G. D., Kavanagh, B. P., et al. (2015) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3687-3 · Cited by 448
Umbrello, M., Formenti, P., Longhi, D., Galimberti, A., Piva, I., Pezzi, A., Mistraletti, G., Marini, J. J., & Iapichino, G. (2015) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0894-9 · Cited by 343
Goligher, E. C., Laghi, F., Detsky, M. E., Farias, P., Murray, A., Brace, D., Brochard, L. J., Bolz, S.-S., Rubenfeld, G. D., Kavanagh, B. P., et al. (2015) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3724-2 · Cited by 315
Tuinman, P. R., Jonkman, A. H., Dres, M., Shi, Z.-H., Goligher, E. C., Goffi, A., de Korte, C., Demoule, A., & Heunks, L. (2020) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-019-05892-8 · Cited by 292
Farghaly, S., & Hasan, A. A. (2017) · Australian Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2016.03.004 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- McCool, F. D., & Tzelepis, G. E.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2012-03-08
- Volume
- 366
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 932-942
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2022028038
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dysfunction of the Diaphragm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmra1007236
- The paper
- McCool, F. D., & Tzelepis, G. E. (2012). Dysfunction of the Diaphragm. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1007236
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.