Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 480

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Survey of Liver Transplantation from Living Adult Donors in the United States

Open access
Brown, Robert S., Russo, Mark W., Lai, Michelle, Shiffman, Mitchell L., Richardson, Michael C., Everhart, James E., Hoofnagle, Jay H.·2003·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The transplantation of the right lobe of a liver from a living adult donor into an adult recipient has been performed increasingly frequently in the United States. Although the use of grafts from living donors is standard practice in transplantation in children, their use in adults remains controversial. METHODS: To study the use of liver transplantation from a living donor, we sent a 24-item questionnaire to all liver-transplantation programs in the United States. Data on indications, evaluation, and outcomes were analyzed with the use of univariate and multivariate methods. Data on recent transplantations were gathered from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and directly from the transplantation programs. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 84 of the 122 programs (69 percent) describing the results of 449 adult-to-adult transplantations of partial livers from living donors that were performed in 42 centers. Fourteen centers had performed more than 10 such transplantations each and together accounted for 80 percent of such transplantations. Centers that performed such transplantations also performed more transplantations of livers from cadaveric donors and more transplantations from living donors in children than centers that did not perform the adult-to-adult procedure (P=0.002 and P=0.001, respectively). A total of 45 percent of potential donors who were evaluated eventually donated a lobe of their liver; 99 percent of these donors were genetically or emotionally related to the recipient. Complications in the donor were more frequent in the centers performing the fewest transplantations from living donors in adults and included biliary complications requiring intervention (in 6.0 percent), reoperation (in 4.5 percent), and death (in one donor [0.2 percent]). Among the recipients, 1.6 percent did not meet criteria for receipt of a cadaveric transplant; cancer, retransplantation, and acute liver failure were uncommon indications for transplantation from a living donor. Biliary complications occurred in 22.0 percent of recipients, and vascular complications occurred in 9.8 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Adult-to-adult liver transplantation from a living donor is increasingly performed in the United States but is concentrated in a few large-volume centers. Mortality among donors is low, but complications in the donor are relatively common.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmsa021345

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 480

Metadata

Authors
Brown, R. S., Russo, M. W., Lai, M., Shiffman, M. L., Richardson, M. C., Everhart, J. E., & Hoofnagle, J. H.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2003-02-27
Volume
348
Issue
9
Pages
818-825
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2120197716
Cited by
480
References
0
FWCI
62.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of Liver Transplantation from Living Adult Donors in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmsa021345
The paper
Brown, R. S., Russo, M. W., Lai, M., Shiffman, M. L., Richardson, M. C., Everhart, J. E., & Hoofnagle, J. H. (2003). A Survey of Liver Transplantation from Living Adult Donors in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa021345

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.