Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,137

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Trends in Opioid Analgesic Abuse and Mortality in the United States

Open access
Dart, Richard C., Surratt, Hilary L., Cicero, Theodore J., Parrino, Mark W., Severtson, S. Geoff, Bucher-Bartelson, Becki, Green, Jody L.·2015·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of prescription opioid medications has increased greatly in the United States during the past two decades; in 2010, there were 16,651 opioid-related deaths. In response, hundreds of federal, state, and local interventions have been implemented. We describe trends in the diversion and abuse of prescription opioid analgesics using data through 2013. METHODS: We used five programs from the Researched Abuse, Diversion, and Addiction-Related Surveillance (RADARS) System to describe trends between 2002 and 2013 in the diversion and abuse of all products and formulations of six prescription opioid analgesics: oxycodone, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, fentanyl, morphine, and tramadol. The programs gather data from drug-diversion investigators, poison centers, substance-abuse treatment centers, and college students. RESULTS: Prescriptions for opioid analgesics increased substantially from 2002 through 2010 in the United States but then decreased slightly from 2011 through 2013. In general, RADARS System programs reported large increases in the rates of opioid diversion and abuse from 2002 to 2010, but then the rates flattened or decreased from 2011 through 2013. The rate of opioid-related deaths rose and fell in a similar pattern. Reported nonmedical use did not change significantly among college students. CONCLUSIONS: Postmarketing surveillance indicates that the diversion and abuse of prescription opioid medications increased between 2002 and 2010 and plateaued or decreased between 2011 and 2013. These findings suggest that the United States may be making progress in controlling the abuse of opioid analgesics. (Funded by the Denver Health and Hospital Authority.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmsa1406143

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1002/ajim.21998 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/pds.3553 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.08.011 · DOI
  4. Inciardi JA, 2009, J Opioid Manag, 5, 81, 10.5055/jom.2009.0009 · doi:10.5055/jom.2009.0009
  5. 10.1002/pds.3533 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.02.012 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.05.008 · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.05.008
  8. 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000001 · DOI
  9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0041181 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041181
  10. 10.3109/15563650.2013.863906 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.04.011 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01327.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1371/journal.pone.0054496 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1056/NEJMc1204141 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,137

Metadata

Authors
Dart, R. C., Surratt, H. L., Cicero, T. J., Parrino, M. W., Severtson, S. G., Bucher-Bartelson, B., & Green, J. L.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2015-01-15
Volume
372
Issue
3
Pages
241-248
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2157406381
Cited by
1,137
References
0
FWCI
189.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in Opioid Analgesic Abuse and Mortality in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmsa1406143
The paper
Dart, R. C., Surratt, H. L., Cicero, T. J., Parrino, M. W., Severtson, S. G., Bucher-Bartelson, B., & Green, J. L. (2015). Trends in Opioid Analgesic Abuse and Mortality in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa1406143

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.