Cited by 173Diversity and Career in MedicineSex and Gender in HealthcareLabour Market and Migration

Physician work hours and the gender pay gap—evidence from primary care.

Open access
Ganguli, Ishani, Sheridan, Bethany, Gray, Joshua, Chernew, Michael, Rosenthal, Meredith B., Neprash, Hannah·2020·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The gender gap in physician pay is often attributed in part to women working fewer hours than men, but evidence to date is limited by self-report and a lack of detail regarding clinical revenue and gender differences in practice style. METHODS: Using national all-payer claims and data from electronic health records, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 24.4 million primary care office visits in 2017 and performed comparisons between female and male physicians in the same practices. Our primary independent variable was physician gender; outcomes included visit revenue, visit counts, days worked, and observed visit time (interval between the initiation and the termination of a visit). We created multivariable regression models at the year, day, and visit level after adjustment for characteristics of the primary care physicians (PCPs), patients, and types of visit and for practice fixed effects. RESULTS: In 2017, female PCPs generated 10.9% less revenue from office visits than their male counterparts (-$39,143.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], -53,523.0 to -24,763.4) and conducted 10.8% fewer visits (-330.5 visits; 95% CI, -406.6 to -254.3) over 2.6% fewer clinical days (-5.3 days; 95% CI, -7.7 to -3.0), after adjustment for age, academic degree, specialty, and number of sessions worked per week, yet spent 2.6% more observed time in visits that year than their male counterparts (1201.3 minutes; 95% CI, 184.7 to 2218.0). Per visit, after adjustment for PCP, patient, and visit characteristics, female PCPs generated equal revenue but spent 15.7% more time with a patient (2.4 minutes; 95% CI, 2.1 to 2.6). These results were consistent in subgroup analyses according to the gender and health status of the patients and the type and complexity of the visits. CONCLUSIONS: Female PCPs generated less visit revenue than male colleagues in the same practices owing to a lower volume of visits, yet spent more time in direct patient care per visit, per day, and per year. (Funded in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmsa2013804

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 173

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [39]Gupta K, Murray SG, Sarkar U, Mourad M, Adler-Milstein J. Differences in ambulatory EHR use patterns for male vs. female physicians. NEJM Catalyst. November 13, 2019 (https://catalyst.nejm.org/ambulatory-ehr-patterns-physician-gender/).
  2. [40]Rama A Policy research perspectives: how are physicians paid? A detailed look at the methods used to compensate physicians in different practice types and specialties. Chicago: American Medical Association, 2018 (https://www.ama-assn.org/sites/ama-assn.org/files/corp/media-browser/member/health-policy/prp-how-physicians-paid.pdf).

Authors
Ganguli, I., Sheridan, B., Gray, J., Chernew, M., Rosenthal, M. B., & Neprash, H.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2020-10
Volume
383
Issue
14
Pages
1349-1357
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3090692068
Cited by
173
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 2
FWCI
35.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K23AG068240)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Labour Market and Migration
Keywords
gender pay gap, physician work hours, primary care physicians, female physicians, clinical productivity, physician remuneration
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Patient Care, Humans, Male, Primary Health Care, Sex Factors, Time Factors, United States, Workload, Health Care Surveys, Electronic Health Records, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review