Physician work hours and the gender pay gap—evidence from primary care.
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The gender gap in physician pay is often attributed in part to women working fewer hours than men, but evidence to date is limited by self-report and a lack of detail regarding clinical revenue and gender differences in practice style. METHODS: Using national all-payer claims and data from electronic health records, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 24.4 million primary care office visits in 2017 and performed comparisons between female and male physicians in the same practices. Our primary independent variable was physician gender; outcomes included visit revenue, visit counts, days worked, and observed visit time (interval between the initiation and the termination of a visit). We created multivariable regression models at the year, day, and visit level after adjustment for characteristics of the primary care physicians (PCPs), patients, and types of visit and for practice fixed effects. RESULTS: In 2017, female PCPs generated 10.9% less revenue from office visits than their male counterparts (-$39,143.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], -53,523.0 to -24,763.4) and conducted 10.8% fewer visits (-330.5 visits; 95% CI, -406.6 to -254.3) over 2.6% fewer clinical days (-5.3 days; 95% CI, -7.7 to -3.0), after adjustment for age, academic degree, specialty, and number of sessions worked per week, yet spent 2.6% more observed time in visits that year than their male counterparts (1201.3 minutes; 95% CI, 184.7 to 2218.0). Per visit, after adjustment for PCP, patient, and visit characteristics, female PCPs generated equal revenue but spent 15.7% more time with a patient (2.4 minutes; 95% CI, 2.1 to 2.6). These results were consistent in subgroup analyses according to the gender and health status of the patients and the type and complexity of the visits. CONCLUSIONS: Female PCPs generated less visit revenue than male colleagues in the same practices owing to a lower volume of visits, yet spent more time in direct patient care per visit, per day, and per year. (Funded in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Female clinicians have longer patient visits.
“Female clinicians have also been shown to have longer patient visits,21,22”
From Evaluation of an Ambient Artificial Intelligence Documentation Platform for Clinicians (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 173
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [39]Gupta K, Murray SG, Sarkar U, Mourad M, Adler-Milstein J. Differences in ambulatory EHR use patterns for male vs. female physicians. NEJM Catalyst. November 13, 2019 (https://catalyst.nejm.org/ambulatory-ehr-patterns-physician-gender/).
- [40]Rama A Policy research perspectives: how are physicians paid? A detailed look at the methods used to compensate physicians in different practice types and specialties. Chicago: American Medical Association, 2018 (https://www.ama-assn.org/sites/ama-assn.org/files/corp/media-browser/member/health-policy/prp-how-physicians-paid.pdf).
- Authors
- Ganguli, I., Sheridan, B., Gray, J., Chernew, M., Rosenthal, M. B., & Neprash, H.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 383
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1349-1357
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- PMC
- PMC10854207
- OpenAlex
- W3090692068
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 35.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (K23AG068240)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Labour Market and Migration
- Keywords
- gender pay gap, physician work hours, primary care physicians, female physicians, clinical productivity, physician remuneration
- MeSH terms
- Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Patient Care, Humans, Male, Primary Health Care, Sex Factors, Time Factors, United States, Workload, Health Care Surveys, Electronic Health Records, Physicians, Primary Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review