The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The New Philanthropy: Private Power in International Development Policy?
Open accessAbstract
This chapter examines the role and function of philanthropy in international development policy. Philanthropy has deep roots in development and its present influence is far from novel. Changes in the political economy of development finance, including growing private aid flows and continuing strain on the bilateral and multilateral aid systems, have increased its relative importance. Simultaneously, newly emerging foundations have financed novel institutional mechanisms for aid delivery in global health and transnational policy networks focussed on democratisation. These mechanisms have substantively shaped international development policy in key development sectors with important implications for the aid architecture by bringing in additional resources, ideas and approaches, while concurrently raising concerns, around the legitimacy and accountability of private actors. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In line with the literature on LMIC-based CSOs47–49 public health50–52 and tobacco control,53 54 the CSOs represented in this study were typically dependent on international (rather than national) and short-term (rather than long-term) funding, the latter in particular made building lasting capacity and effective coalitions difficult.”
From Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews (2020) · cites this paper as [48]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Anheier, H. and Toepler S. 1999 ‘Philanthropic Foundations: and International Perspective’ in Private Funds Public Purpose: Philanthropic Foundations in International Perspective Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York. · DOI
- Arnove, R.F. (ed.). 1980. Philanthropy and cultural imperialism: The foundations at home and abroad. Boston: G.K. Hall.
- Berman, E.H. 1983. The influence of the Carnegie, Ford, and Rockefeller foundations on American foreign policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Bishop, M.L., and M. Green. 2008. Philanthrocapitalism: How the rich can save the world. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
- Buse, K., and S. Tanaka. 2011. Global public-private health partnerships: Lessons learned from ten years of experience and evaluation. International Dental Journal 61: 2–10. · DOI
- Center for Global Prosperity. 2013. The 2013 index of global philanthropy and remittances. Washington, DC: Center for Global Prosperity, The Hudson Institute.
- Desai, R., and H. Kharas. 2014. The new global landscape of poverty alleviation and development: Foundations, NGOs, social media, and other private sector institutions. In Human dignity and the future of global institutions, ed. M.P. Lagon and A. Clark. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Di Bella, J., A. Grant, S. Kindornay, and S. Tissot. 2013. Mapping private sector engagements in development cooperation. Ottawa: The North–south Institute.
- Easterly, W. 2006. The white man’s burden: Why the west’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: Penguin.
- Foundation, Ford. 1991. Investing for social gain: Reflections on two decades of program-related investments. New York: Ford Foundation.
- Foundation Center. 2012. International grantmaking update: A snapshot of US foundation trends. New York: Foundation Center.
- Guilhot, N. 2007. Reforming the world: George Soros, global capitalism and the philanthropic management of the social sciences. Critical Sociology 33: 447–477. · DOI
- Herdt, R.W. 2012. People, institutions, and technology: A personal view of the role of foundations in international agricultural research and development 1960-2010. Food Policy 37: 179–190. · DOI
- Holt-Gimenez, E. 2008. Out of AGRA: The green revolution returns to Africa. Development 51: 464–471. · DOI
- Illingworth, P., T. Pogge, and L. Wenar. 2011. Introduction. In Giving well: The ethics of philanthropy, ed. P. Illingworth, T. Pogge, and L. Wenar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
- Johnson, P. 2010. Global institutional philanthropy: A preliminary status report. Boston: World-wide Initiatives for Grantmaker Support and The Philanthropic Initiative.
- Karl, B., and S. Katz. 1987. Foundations and ruling class elites. Daedalus 116: 1–40.
- McCoy, D., G. Kembhavi, J. Patel, and A. Luintel. 2009. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s grant-making programme for global health. The Lancet 373: 1645–1653. · DOI
- McGoey, L. 2014. The philanthropic state: Market–state hybrids in the philanthrocapitalist turn. Third World Quarterly 35: 109–125. · DOI
- Moran, M. 2011. Private foundations and global health partnerships: Philanthropists and 'partnership brokerage. In Partnerships and foundations in global health governance, ed. S. Rushton and O. Williams. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Moran, M. 2014. Private foundations and development partnerships: American philanthropy and global development agendas. London and New York: Routledge. · DOI
- Moran, M., and M. Stevenson. 2013. Illumination and innovation: What philanthropic foundations bring to global health governance. Global Society 27: 117–137. · DOI
- Moran, M., and M. Stevenson. 2014. Partnerships and the MDGs: The challenge of reforming global health governance. In The handbook of global health policy, ed. G. Brown, G. Yamey, and S. Wamala. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Parmar, I. 2002. American foundations and the development of international knowledge networks. Global Networks 2: 13–30. · DOI
- Ravishankar, N., P. Gubbins, R.J. Cooley, K. Leach-Kemon, C.M. Michaud, and D.T. Jamison. 2009. Financing of global health: Tracking development assistance for health from 1990 to 2007. The Lancet 373: 2113–2124. · DOI
- Riddell, R.C. 2007. Does foreign aid really work? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Roelofs, J. 2003. Foundations and public policy. New York: SUNY Press.
- Rushton, S., and O. Williams. 2011. Introduction. In Partnerships and foundations in global health governance, ed. S. Rushton and O. Williams. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. · DOI
- Srivastava, P., and S. Oh. 2010. Private foundations, philanthropy, and partnership in education and development: Mapping the terrain. International Journal of Educational Development 30: 460–71. · DOI
- Stone, D. 2013. Knowledge actors and transnational governance: The Public-Private Policy Nexus in the Global Agora. Palgrave MacMillan. · DOI
- Sulla, O. 2007. Philanthropic foundations and their role in international development assistance. International Finance Briefing Note 3: 1–5.
- The Lancet. 2009. Who runs global health? The Lancet 373: 2083. · DOI
- Vogel, A. 2006. Who’s making global civil society: Philanthropy and US empire in world society. British Journal of Sociology 7: 635–655. · DOI
- Youde, J. 2013. The Rockefeller and Gates foundations in global health governance. Global Society 27: 139–158. · DOI
Cited by
Matthes, B. K., Robertson, L., & Gilmore, A. B. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044710 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Moran, M., & Stone, D.
- Affiliations
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- ORCID
- Stone, Diane
- Venue
- The Palgrave Handbook of International Development
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 297-313
- OpenAlex
- W2484724294
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
- University of Canberra Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- University of Warwick (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Development › International Development and Aid
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Keywords
- philanthropy, private power, international development policy, development finance, global health, transnational policy networks, democratization, legitimacy and accountability, aid architecture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The New Philanthropy: Private Power in International Development Policy? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/978-1-137-42724-3_17
- The paper
- Moran, M., & Stone, D. (2016). The New Philanthropy: Private Power in International Development Policy? The Palgrave Handbook of International Development. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-42724-3_17
