The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transnational Advocacy Networks in the Information Society: Partners or Pawns?
Abstract
This book examines the role of transnational advocacy networks in enabling effective participation for individual citizens in the deliberative processes of global governance. Contextualized around the
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The California-based ICANN was ostensibly subject to multi-stakeholder governance from its inception [85]; p. 115), including national governments, internet service providers, business actors, nonprofits and internet users, but primary control was exercised by its Board of Directors and ICANN's public principal, the US government [86]; p. 561).”
From Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance (2020) · cites this paper as [85]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance
De Filippi, P., Mannan, M., & Reijers, W. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Cogburn, D. L.
- Affiliations
- American University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cogburn, Derrick L.
- ORCID
- Cogburn, Derrick L.
- Venue
- Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan US
- Published
- 2017
- OpenAlex
- W2576913954
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- World Bank Group
- W.K. Kellogg Foundation
- University of Oklahoma
- Department of Political Science, University of Washington
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- transnational advocacy networks, global governance, citizen participation, deliberative democracy, information society, civil society, transnational activism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transnational Advocacy Networks in the Information Society: Partners or Pawns? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/978-1-137-48361-4
- The paper
- Cogburn, D. L. (2017). Transnational Advocacy Networks in the Information Society: Partners or Pawns? Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48361-4
