The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Criminology of Corruption
Abstract
This book uniquely applies theoretical approaches from criminology and sociology to the problem of corruption. Theoretical thoughts have future consequences on how we treat, punish and deter and corru
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For the teachers that participated in the research, a connection with the subject discipline was a key factor in sustaining them throughout their career (for full details see Brooks, 2016).”
From Pedagogy and identity in initial teacher education: developing a ‘professional compass’ (2017) · cites this paper as Brooks, 2016
Citations
Cites
Crime, Shame and Reintegration
Braithwaite, J. (1989) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804618 · Cited by 4,153
Metadata
- Authors
- Brooks, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Wolverhampton (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Brooks, Graham
- ORCID
- Brooks, Graham
- Venue
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 2016
- OpenAlex
- W2556526696
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- corruption, criminology of corruption, criminological theory, sociology of corruption, punishment, deterrence, offender treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
