The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Primary Institutions of the Middle Eastern Regional Interstate Society
Abstract
The objective of this chapter is to review the primary institutions of international society in relation to the Middle East, and analyse how they agree or differ from the global understanding. Given the constitutive character of institutions in forming international society and defining its nature, this exercise will help to elucidate the questions whether the Middle East is a regional international society and where the region stands in relation to the global pattern.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is no doubt that ' pan-Arabism, by its nature, aspired to the utmost Arab unity, threatening the sovereignty of the new fragile borders ' (Gonzalez-Pelaez 2009, 94).”
From Imagining the Middle East: the state, nationalism and regional international society (2015) · cites this paper as Gonzalez-Pelaez 2009
In the citing paper
“When ' the Charter of the League of Arab states prioritized the respect for sovereignty ' in 1945, it was institutionalized as much as with regard to their European counterparts in international society (Gonzalez-Pelaez 2009, 94).”
From Imagining the Middle East: the state, nationalism and regional international society (2015) · cites this paper as Gonzalez-Pelaez 2009
In the citing paper
“(a) The primary institutions of the Middle Eastern ' regional interstate society ' : state, nationalism and sovereignty, which are compared and contrasted to the primary institution at the global level -state sovereignty, diplomacy, territoriality, great power management, war, nationalism, equality of people, the market and environmental stewardship (Gonzalez-Pelaez 2009, 94 -115).”
From Imagining the Middle East: the state, nationalism and regional international society (2015) · cites this paper as Gonzalez-Pelaez 2009
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Imagining the Middle East: the state, nationalism and regional international society
Göl, A. (2015) · Global Discourse · doi:10.1080/23269995.2015.1053191 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Gonzalez-Pelaez, A.
- Corresponding author
- Gonzalez-Pelaez, Ana
- Venue
- International Society and the Middle East
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 92-116
- OpenAlex
- W2460444872
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Peace and Security Dynamics
- Keywords
- primary institutions, international society, Middle East, regionalism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
