The Frontiers of Democracy
Abstract
The Frontiers of Democracy offers a comprehensive examination of restrictions on the vote in democracies today. For the first time, the reasons for excluding people (prisoners, children, intellectuall
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If a decision significantly affects my interests, what I can rightfully demand is that the body taking it give those interests due consideration.
“In general, if a decision is going to be made somewhere that significantly affects my interests, what I can rightfully demand is that the body taking that decision should give those interests due consideration (Beckman, 2009, pp. 45-46).”
From Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem (2020) · cites this paper as Beckman, 2009
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 110
- Authors
- Beckman, L.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Beckman, Ludvig
- ORCID
- Beckman, Ludvig
- Venue
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 2009
- OpenAlex
- W2483473578
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Keywords
- voting restrictions, electoral exclusion, democracy, prisoners' voting rights, intellectual disability, political participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
