The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness
Abstract
Challenging notions of what constitutes 'normal' and 'pathological' bodies, this ambitious, agenda-setting study theoretically reinvigorates disability studies by reconceptualising it as 'studies of a
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Academic Ableism: Disability and Higher Education
Dolmage, J. (2017) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.9708722 · Cited by 884
Dis/entangling Critical Disability Studies
Goodley, D. (2013) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.717884 · Cited by 575
Ableism in academia: where are the disabled and ill academics?
Brown, N., & Leigh, J. (2018) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2018.1455627 · Cited by 372
Ortega, F., & Orsini, M. (2020) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2020.1795223 · Cited by 325
Technology for people, not disabilities: Ensuring access and inclusion
Foley, A., & Ferri, B. A. (2012) · Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs · doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01230.x · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, F. K.
- Venue
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 2009
- OpenAlex
- W4241611109
- Cited by
- 1,230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.49
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/9780230245181
- The paper
- Campbell, F. K. (2009). Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245181
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
