CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21Feminist Theory and Gender StudiesGender and Feminist StudiesGender, Health, and Social Inequality

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complexities and Complications: Intersections of Class and Sexuality

Taylor, Yvette·2010·Theorizing Intersectionality and Sexuality
DOI 10.1057/9780230304093_3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Here I explore some questions and dilemmas raised by considering social class, gender and sexuality within the same interconnecting research frame-work. I begin with attention to the theoretical development of intersectionality, arising from feminist conceptualisations of ‘differences that matter’, and the ways these are included in or excluded from research agendas. Exploring the limits and possibilities of intersectionality, I ask what counts as ‘intersectional’? Arguing that interconnections between class and sexuality have often been neglected in such moves, I seek to progress beyond intersectionality as a theoretical paradigm, towards understanding intersectionality as a lived experience. I draw upon research on working-class lesbian lives (Taylor, 2007a) and lesbian and gay parenting (Taylor, 2009a) to bridge the gap between theorisation of intersectionality and its research application, where inequalities are seen as more than simply a list of ‘additions’ but as multiply constitutive, complex and complicated. Although an intersectional analysis poses challenges, it remains imperative, where, as Haschemi Yekani et al. (Chapter 4, this volume) have pointed out, the task is to ‘try again’, attempted here in uncovering experiential aspects of intersectionality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/9780230304093_3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Acker, J. (2008) ‘Feminist Theory’s Unfinished Business’, Gender and Society 22(1): 104–08. · DOI
  2. Ahmed, S. (1998) Differences ferences thatMatter: Feminist Theory and Postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  3. Anthias, F. (2001) ‘New Hybridities, Old Concepts: The Limits of “Culture”’ Ethnic and Racial Studies 24(4): 619–41. · DOI
  4. Anthias, F. (2002) ‘Beyond Feminism and Multiculturalism; Locating Difference and the Politics of Location’, Women’s Studies International Forum 25(3): 275–86. · DOI
  5. Anthias, F. and Yuval-Davis (1983) ‘Contextualizing Feminism: Gender, Ethnic and Class Divisions’, Feminist Review 15:62–75. · DOI
  6. Anzaldúa, G. (1988) ‘To(o) Queer the Writer: Loca, Escrito, y Chicana’, in C. Trujillo (ed.) Living Chicana Theoty. Berkeley: Third Woman Press.
  7. Berger, M. T. (2004) Workable Sisterhood: The Political Journey of Stigmatized Womanhood with HIV/AIDS. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  8. Berger, M. T and Guidroz, K. (2009) The Intersectional Approach. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  9. Bradley, H. and Hebson, G. (1999) ‘Breaking the Silence: The Need to Re-Articulate Class’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 19(9): 178–203. · DOI
  10. Brah, A. and Phoenix, A. (2004) ‘Ain’t I A Woman? Revisiting Intersectionality’, Journal of International Women’s Studies 5(3): 75–86.
  11. Byrne, B. (2006) White Lives: The Interplay of Race’, Class and Gender in Everyday Life. London, New York: Routledge. · DOI
  12. Davis, K. (2008) ‘Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on what Makes a Feminist Theory Successful’, Feminist Theory 9(1): 67–85. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Dunne, G. A. (1997) Lesbian Lifestyles: Women’s Work and the Politics of Sexuality. London: Macmillian Press Limited. · DOI
  14. Epstein, D. (1994) Challenging Lesbian and Gay Inequalities in Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  15. Giddens, A. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  16. Haritaworn, J. (2007), ‘Queer Mixed Race? Interrogating Homonormativity through Thai Interraciality,’ in G. Brown, K. Browne and J. Lim (eds), Geographies of Sexualities: Theory, Practices and Politics, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 101–12.
  17. Hennessy, R. (2006) ‘The Value of a Second Skin’, in D. Richardson, J. McLaughlin, and M. Casey(eds) Intersections in Feminist and Queer Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Jackson, S. (2006) ‘Heterosexuality, Sexuality and Gender: Re-Thinking the Intersections’, in D. Richardson, J. McLaughlin, and M. Casey (eds) Intersections in Feminist and Queer Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  19. Jamieson, L. (1998) Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  20. Jeffreys, S. (2003) Unpacking Queer Politics: A Lesbian Feminist Perspective. Oxford: Polity.
  21. Lutz, H. ‘Intersectional Analysis: A Way Out of Multiple Dilemmas?’ paper presented at the International Sociological Association conference, Brisbane, July 2002.
  22. Mac an Ghaill, M. (1994) The Making of Men: Masculinities, Sexualities and Schooling. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  23. McDermott, E. (2003) ‘Telling Lesbian Stories: Interviewing and the Class Dynamics of “talk”’, Women’s Studies International Forum 27(3): 177–87. · DOI
  24. Mirza, H. S. (ed.) (1997) Black British Feminism: A Reader. London: Routledge.
  25. Nayak, A. (2003) Race, Place and Globalization: Youth Cultures in a Changing World. Oxford: Berg.
  26. Plummer, K. (1998) ‘The Past, Present, and Futures of the Sociology of Same-Sex Relations’, in P.M. Nardi and B. Schneider (eds) Social Perspectives in Lesbian and Gay Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 605–14.
  27. Richardson, D. and Robinson, V. (2007) Introducing Gender and Women’s Studies. (3rd edn). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  28. Richardson, D., McLaughlin, J. and Casey, M. (eds) (2006) Intersections in Feminist and Queer Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. · DOI
  29. Schilt, K. (2008) ‘The Unfinished Business of Sexuality: Comment on Andersen’ Gender and Society 22(1): 109–14. · DOI
  30. Skeggs, B. (1997) Formations of Class and Gender. London: Sage.
  31. Skeggs, B. (2001) ‘The Toilet Paper: Femininity, Class and Mis-Recognition’, Women’s Studies International Forum 24(3/4): 295–307. · DOI
  32. Taylor, Y. (2004) ‘Negotiation and Navigation: An Exploration of the Spaces/Places of Working-Class Lesbians’, Sociological Research Online, Vol. 9 (1): 1–24. · DOI
  33. Taylor, Y. (2005) ‘Classed in a Classless Climate’, Feminism and Psychology 15(4): 491–500. · DOI
  34. Taylor, Y. (2007a) Classed Outsiders: Working-Class Lesbian Life Experiences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. · DOI
  35. Taylor, Y. (2007b) ‘“If your face doesn’t fit …”: The Misrecognition of Working-Class Lesbians in Scene Space’, Leisure Studies 27: 161–78. · DOI
  36. Taylor, Y. (2008) ‘“That’s not really my scene”: Working-Class Lesbians in (and out of) Place’, Sexualities 11(5), 523–46. · DOI
  37. Taylor, Y. (2009a) Lesbian and Gay Parenting: Securing Social and Educational Capital. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. · DOI
  38. Taylor, Y. (2009b) ‘Facts, Fictions, Identity Constrictions: Sexuality, Gender and Class in Higher Education’, Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review Special Issue 10(1): 38–47. · DOI
  39. Taylor, Y. (2009c) ‘Interesting Intersections? Researching Class, Gender and Sexuality’, in M. T Berger and K. Guidroz (eds) The Intersectional Approach. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  40. Taylor, Y. (2010b) ‘The “Outness” of Queer: Class and Sexual Intersections’ in K. Browne and C. Nash (eds) Queer Methodologies. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  41. Taylor, Y. (ed.) (2010c) Classed Intersections: Spaces, Selves, Knowledges. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  42. Valentine, G. (1995) ‘Out and About: Geographies of Lesbian Landscapes’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 19 (1): 96–111. · DOI
  43. Valentine, G. (2007) ‘Theorizing and Researching Intersectionality: A Challenge for Feminist Geography’, The Professional Geographer 59(1): 10–21. · DOI
  44. Weston, K. (1996) Render Me, Gender Me. Lesbians Talk Sex, Class, Color, Studmuffins …. New York: Columbia University Press.
  45. Yuval-Davis, Nira (2006) ‘Intersectionality and Feminist Politics’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3): p.193–209. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Taylor, Y.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Yvette
ORCID
Taylor, Yvette
Venue
Theorizing Intersectionality and Sexuality
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Published
2010
Pages
37-55
DOI
10.1057/9780230304093_3
OpenAlex
W3210273070
Cited by
21
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.05
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
intersectionality, social class, sexuality, gender, lived experience, feminist theory, inequality, class and sexuality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review