Cited by 76Historical, Religious, and Philosophical StudiesMedieval and Early Modern JusticeHistorical Philosophy and Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Realities of Witchcraft and Popular Magic in Early Modern Europe

Bever, Edward·2008·Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks

Abstract

Exploring the elements of reality in early modern witchcraft and popular magic, through a combination of detailed archival research and broad-ranging interdisciplinary analyses, this book complements

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/9780230582118

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 76

Metadata

Authors
Bever, E.
Corresponding author
Bever, Edward
Venue
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks
Published
2008
OpenAlex
W2491951625
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.98
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval and Early Modern Justice
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Historical Philosophy and Science
Keywords
witchcraft, popular magic, early modern Europe, witch trials, folk beliefs, supernatural beliefs, history of magic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review