The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement
Abstract
Most of the methods designed for the analysis of poverty share two main limitations: (i) they are unidimensional, i.e. refer to only one proxy of poverty such as low income or consumption expenditure; (ii) they need to dichotomize the population into the poor and the non-poor by means of the so-called poverty line. Nowadays many authors recognize that poverty is a complex phenomenon that cannot be reduced to the sole monetary dimension. This leads to the need for a multidimensional approach that consists in extending the analysis to a variety of non-monetary indicators of living conditions. Such a multidimensional analysis has indeed become increasingly feasible as more information has become available, and this in turn has induced many countries to launch surveys covering the various aspects of living conditions. In this chapter we present a survey of the research on the fuzzy approach to poverty measurement which was launched by the contribution of Cerioli and Zani (1990). We emphasized elements which a fuzzy approach takes into account and which are ignored by the conventional analysis of poverty. We note that in the fuzzy approach, choices have to be made concerning at least two additional aspects: Membership functions. I t is necessary to give a quantitative specification to the propensity to poverty and deprivation of each individual in the population, given the level and distribution of income and other indicators of living standards. Rules for manipulation of the resulting fuzzy sets. This issue concerns in particular the definition of complements and the intersection, union and aggregation of sets. A major objective of this chapter is to make clear that these choices must meet some basic logical and substantive requirements to be meaningful. We discussed and proposed measures reflecting the multidimensional aspects of deprivation, in particular measures of the degree of overlap between monetary and non-monetary deprivation, and also developed a number of fuzzy measures of the degree of persistence of poverty over time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006 · Cited by 684
Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.026 · Cited by 916
Poverty and inequality in the rural Brazilian Amazon: a multidimensional approach
Guedes, G. R., Brondízio, E. S., Barbieri, A. F., Anne, R., Penna-Firme, R., & D’Antona, Á. O. (2012) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-011-9444-5 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Venue
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 2008
- OpenAlex
- W633487266
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.07
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/9780230582354
- The paper
- Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. (2008). Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582354
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.