The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rethinking Miscarriages of Justice
Abstract
Drawing on Foucauldian theory and 'social harm' paradigms, Naughton offers a radical redefinition of miscarriages of justice from a critical perspective. This book uncovers the limits of the entire cr
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the less obvious non-physical harms of wrongful conviction that are more diverse, longer lasting and difficult to diagnose (Naughton, 2007:164) remain obscured.”
From The Zemiological Afterlife of Wrongful Conviction: Spoiled Identity, Repair and Survivorship (2024) · cites this paper as Naughton, 2007
In the citing paper
“Given that subsequent academic analyses show the failure of the CCRC to eliminate wrongful conviction and that the misuse of emergency legislation continued long after the Birmingham Six's release (Naughton, 2007(Naughton, , 2013), Hill's concerns seem well founded.”
From The Zemiological Afterlife of Wrongful Conviction: Spoiled Identity, Repair and Survivorship (2024) · cites this paper as Naughton, 2007
In the citing paper
“Although this naturally obstructs their ability to adapt post-release and rebuild a meaningful relationship with society, these enduring social harms are not captured in official data (McNaughton, 2003), are often overlooked in policy and practice (Hoyle & Tilt, 2018), and go unacknowledged in the official discourse of the criminal justice system (Mc Naughton, 2007).”
From The Zemiological Afterlife of Wrongful Conviction: Spoiled Identity, Repair and Survivorship (2024) · cites this paper as Mc Naughton, 2007
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The impact of a child protection investigation: a personal reflective account
Davies, P. A. (2010) · Child & Family Social Work · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00732.x · Cited by 62
Citizens’ Attitudes Toward Wrongful Convictions
Zalman, M., Larson, M. J., & Smith, B. W. (2011) · Criminal Justice Review · doi:10.1177/0734016811428374 · Cited by 45
Surveillance Technologies, Wrongful Criminalisation, and the Presumption of Innocence
Hadjimatheou, K. (2016) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-016-0218-2 · Cited by 30
Cultural consequences of miscarriages of justice
Cole, S. A. (2009) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.874 · Cited by 20
Harm, injustice & technology: Reflections on the UK's subpostmasters’ case
McGuire, M. R., & Renaud, K. (2023) · The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice · doi:10.1111/hojo.12533 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Naughton, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Naughton, Michael
- ORCID
- Naughton, Michael
- Venue
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 2007
- OpenAlex
- W2476346330
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
- Keywords
- miscarriage of justice, Foucauldian theory, social harm, criminal justice, critical criminology, wrongful convictions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rethinking Miscarriages of Justice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/9780230598966
- The paper
- Naughton, M. (2007). Rethinking Miscarriages of Justice. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598966
