CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20Medieval Literature and HistoryPostcolonial and Cultural Literary StudiesHistorical, Literary, and Cultural Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Literary Subversions of Medieval Women

Chance, Jane·2007·Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks
DOI 10.1057/9780230605596
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study of medieval women as postcolonial writers defines the literary strategies of subversion by which they authorized their alterity within the dominant tradition. To dismantle a colonizing cult

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/9780230605596

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chance, J.
Corresponding author
Chance, Jane
Venue
Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan US
Published
2007
DOI
10.1057/9780230605596
OpenAlex
W593104898
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.23
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
Keywords
medieval women, postcolonial literary theory, subversion, otherness, women writers, gender and colonialism, medieval literature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review