The DOI matches its Crossref record.
International Security
Abstract
The disappearance of Cold War bipolarity has fundamentally changed the dynamics of international security. In this chapter, I portray the United States left alone without its major competitor, the Soviet Union, wavering between multilateralism and unilateralism, and easily constrained by domestic actors, narrow special interests and moody public opinion. During the Cold War, the two superpowers were compelled to get involved in most regional conflicts due to their global competition. Their rivalry often caused and complicated local conflicts, as they intervened directly or supported proxy wars in such diverse areas as Vietnam, Afghanistan, Angola, Ethiopia and Nicaragua. But the superpowers also played the role of de facto world policemen, providing security guarantees throughout the world. In the post- Cold War world, however, both Russia and the United States have often disengaged from regional affairs, especially when no significant strategic interest has existed. They have taken a more selective approach to their regional security commitments, and frequently pursued a policy of benign neglect towards remote local conflicts. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization
Gleditsch, K. S., & Ward, M. D. (2006) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818306060309 · Cited by 832
The Future of U.S.-China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?
Friedberg, A. L. (2005) · International Security · doi:10.1162/016228805775124589 · Cited by 438
Determinants of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation
Jo, D.-J., & Gartzke, E. (2007) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002706296158 · Cited by 351
The Unipolar Illusion Revisited: The Coming End of the United States' Unipolar Moment
Layne, C. (2006) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec.2006.31.2.7 · Cited by 305
Conflict, Peace, and the Evolution of Women's Empowerment
Webster, K., Chen, C., & Beardsley, K. (2019) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818319000055 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Inoguchi, T.
- Venue
- Global Change
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 2001
- Pages
- 33-44
- OpenAlex
- W4249773485
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 136.41
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Security. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/9780333985557_3
- The paper
- Inoguchi, T. (2001). International Security. Global Change. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333985557_3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.