The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conceptualizing Digital Game-Mediated L2 Learning and Pedagogy
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy
Gee, J. P. (2003) · Computers in Entertainment · doi:10.1145/950566.950595 · Cited by 5,735
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Readers, Players, and Watchers: EFL Students’ Vocabulary Acquisition through Digital Video Games
Ebrahimzadeh, M. (2017) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v10n2p1 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Reinhardt, J., & Sykes, J. M.
- ORCID
- Reinhardt, Jonathon
- Venue
- Digital Games in Language Learning and Teaching
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan
- Published
- 2014-02-18
- OpenAlex
- W2485124494
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Palgrave Macmillan eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- video games, game-based learning, second language acquisition, language teaching, conceptual framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
