Cited by 34EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningEnglish Language Learning and TeachingSecond Language Learning and Teaching

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The ELT Textbook

Richards, Jack C.·2014·International Perspectives on Materials in ELT

Abstract

Despite the advances in technology and the role of the internet, coursebooks are the main teaching resource used by many of the world’s English teachers. The extent of English teaching worldwide could probably not be sustained without the support of the many different kinds of textbooks and their ancillaries that are available to support English teachers (Tomlinson, 2003). In many schools textbooks provide the main basis for the curriculum (Richards, 1993). Appel (2011: 50-51) comments: ‘In no other school subject do coursebooks exert a similar influence as in language teaching. The book is in fact often treated as the syllabus.’ Coursebooks often determine the goals and content of teaching, as well as the methods teachers use. For both teachers and learners, the textbook provides a map that lays out the general content of lessons and a sense of structure that gives coherence to individual lessons, as well as to an entire course. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/9781137023315_2

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Byrd, P. (1995). Material Writers Guide. Boston: Heinle.
  2. Cheng, X. (2002). English Textbook Analysis and Design. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  3. Cunningsworth, A. (1994). Evaluating and Selecting ESL Materials. London: Heinemann.
  4. Harwood, N. (ed.) (2010). English Language Teaching Materials. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. McAndrew, J. (2007). Responding to learners’ language needs in an oral EFL class. In A. Burns and H. Joyce (eds), Planning and Teaching Creatively within a Required Curriculum. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
  6. Richards, J. C. (1995). Easier said than done: an insider’s account of a textbook project. In Hidalgo, A., Hall, D. and Jacobs, G. (eds), Getting Started on Materials Writing. Singapore: RELC, pp. 93-135.
  7. Savova, L. (ed.) (2009). Using Textbooks Effectively. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 34

Metadata

Authors
Richards, J. C.
Corresponding author
Richards, Jack C.
Venue
International Perspectives on Materials in ELT
Published
2014
Pages
19-36
OpenAlex
W2416096112
Cited by
34
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
English language teaching textbooks, coursebooks, textbook design, language syllabus, teaching materials, course program, English as a foreign language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ELT Textbook. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/9781137023315_2
The paper
Richards, J. C. (2014). The ELT Textbook. International Perspectives on Materials in ELT. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023315_2