Global Textbooks in Local Contexts: An Empirical Investigation of Effectiveness
Abstract
Global textbooks (GTs) — full-featured English language teaching materials containing a range of workbooks, videos, CD-ROMs, and online materials — have become a major feature of Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) pedagogy in the 21st century. However, they are much maligned by some scholars as tools of cultural imperialism that damage local cultures and contribute to the learners’ failure to acquire proficiency in English as a Foreign Language. This chapter uncovers a number of the sociopolitical dynamics that give rise to GT opposition, and questions some of the more strident claims of anti-GT scholars. The chapter then presents a six-year empirical study conducted at a university English language program in Japan, where nearly 700 students have used a GT as the core material. Drawing from both qualitative and statistical analyses, this chapter concludes that GTs have significant potential for becoming an effective resource for second language learning, but the greatest chance of pedagogical improvement seems most likely in language programs where major institutional stakeholders achieve an acceptable degree of political equilibrium.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Total sales among the top four ELT publishers surpassed £1 billion in 2011.
“total sales among the top four ELT publishers surpassed £1 billion in 2011 (Hadley, 2014)”
From The Global ELT coursebook: A case of Cinderella's slipper? (2022) · cites this paper as Hadley, 2014
Due to their massive commercial success, coursebook formats have continued to replicate each other in a self-perpetuating 'washback effect' whereby new coursebooks are based on previous commercially successful models.
“Due, one would surmise, to their massive commercial success -total sales among the top four ELT publishers surpassed £1 billion in 2011 (Hadley, 2014) -coursebook formats have continued to replicate each other in a self-perpetuating ' washback effect ' whereby new coursebooks are based on previous commercially successful models.”
From The Global ELT coursebook: A case of Cinderella's slipper? (2022) · cites this paper as Hadley, 2014
There are strong indications that global textbooks can play an important role in helping, and not harming, second language learning.
“there are strong indications that GTs [global textbooks] can play an important role in helping, and not harming , second language learning ' (Hadley, 2014, p. 230, my italics).”
From The Global ELT coursebook: A case of Cinderella's slipper? (2022) · cites this paper as Hadley, 2014
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 151 · Cited by 25
- Authors
- Hadley, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hadley, Gregory
- ORCID
- Hadley, Gregory
- Venue
- English Language Teaching Textbooks
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 205-238
- OpenAlex
- W2483599498
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 151
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- English language teaching materials, cultural imperialism, English as a foreign language, textbook effectiveness, institutional stakeholders, university English programs, Japan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review