The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Politics of Third Wave Feminisms
Abstract
The past twenty years have witnessed a renewal of interest in feminist activism on both sides of the Atlantic. In part this has been a response to neoliberal and neoconservative attacks, both implicit
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Instead, white, middle-class, cisgender, heterosexual, and able-bodied women still predominate the movements (Erevelles, 2011;Evans, 2015;Laperrière & Lépinard, 2016).”
From Intersectional power struggles in feminist movements: An analysis of resistance and counter‐resistance to intersectionality (2024) · cites this paper as Evans, 2015
In the citing paper
“while most feminist movements have enthusiastically adopted the intersectional discourse, research shows how a desire for intersectionality does not translate into actual intersectional practices that effectively challenge privilege within movements.”
From Intersectional power struggles in feminist movements: An analysis of resistance and counter‐resistance to intersectionality (2024) · cites this paper as Evans, 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
#MeToo, Weinstein and Feminism
Boyle, K. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28243-1_1 · Cited by 40
Laperrière, M., & Lépinard, E. (2016) · Politics · doi:10.1177/0263395716649009 · Cited by 67
“In recent years, intersectionality has become a “normative goal, or preferred mode of organizing” invoked by feminists and activists from various social movements who claim to represent single identity constituencies, such as “women,” in all their diversity (Weldon, 2008: 217; see also Evans, 2015).”
BackgroundFerree, M. M., & Zippel, K. S. (2015) · Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society · doi:10.1093/sp/jxv039 · Cited by 75
“Its advocates are no more specific, since “those who advance a neoliberal agenda do not defend neoliberalism qua neoliberalism. . . . Neoliberalism is in this respect rather like patriarchy: few openly speak its name” (Evans 2015, 41).”
BackgroundGrosser, K., & McCarthy, L. (2018) · Gender, Work & Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.12267 · Cited by 53
“…where many social movements, including feminist ones, are marginalized from CSR as a process of governance due to lack of resources (Bolström and Hallström, 2010; Grosser, 2016), new mobilizing structures, both forms and tactics, are emerging involving online feminist activism (Evans, 2015).”
BackgroundTwitter, Team GB and the Australian Olympic Team: representations of gender in social media spaces
Litchfield, C., & Kavanagh, E. J. (2018) · Sport in Society · doi:10.1080/17430437.2018.1504775 · Cited by 55
“Evans (2015) explained that third wave feminists have ‘embraced individualism and diversity and sought to redefine what it means to be a feminist’ (22).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Evans, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Evans, Elizabeth
- ORCID
- Evans, Elizabeth
- Venue
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 2015
- OpenAlex
- W2502781310
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- third-wave feminism, feminist activism, neoliberalism, neoconservatism, women's movement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
