The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Critically Evaluating Materials for CLIL: Practitioners’ Practices and Perspectives
Abstract
This chapter presents a critical perspective on materials selection, adaptation, design, use and content in one second language education context, content and language integrated learning, or CLIL. CLIL is an educational approach in which curriculum subjects are taught through a language which is not the one normally used by teachers and students. Although any language can be used in CLIL or related approaches such as immersion, 1 English has become the dominant language to the extent that it has been suggested that a more accurate acronym might be CEIL — content and English integrated learning (Dalton-Puffer et al., 2010). Indeed, in terms of English language education, Graddol (2006) predicts that CLIL, along with the teaching of English to young learners and English as a lingua franca will be the dominant trend and will eventually replace English as a foreign language. The implementation of CLIL where it involves substantial teaching of non-language subject matter through a foreign language goes well beyond the introduction of new language teaching methodologies or approaches. It involves a ‘reculturing’ (Fullan, 2007) of not only the field of language teaching, but right across the curriculum as non-language subjects are involved. This reculturing affects all components of the system, and educational materials are central to this. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algor…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, such teachers often face the challenge of not having appropriate materials to deliver such courses.”
From Can engaging L2 teachers as material designers contribute to their professional development? findings from Colombia (2020) · cites this paper as Morton, 2013
In the citing paper
“Since its origin, the lack of appropriate materials has been documented as a drawback for the successful and sustainable spread of CLIL (Ball, 2018; Morton, 2013).”
From Can engaging L2 teachers as material designers contribute to their professional development? findings from Colombia (2020) · cites this paper as Morton, 2013
In the citing paper
“While our study confirms Morton's (2013) assertion about secondary teachers' opportunities to enact agency as CLIL materials developers, our findings show that similar results can be obtained when university teachers develop principle-informed CLIL materials (Coyle et al., 2010; Moore & Lorenzo, 2015; Nikula et al., 2016) for higher education learners and courses.”
From Can engaging L2 teachers as material designers contribute to their professional development? findings from Colombia (2020) · cites this paper as Morton's (2013)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Banegas, D. L., Corrales, K., & Poole, P. (2020) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102265 · Cited by 42
Teachers develop CLIL materials in Argentina: A workshop experience
BANEGAS, D. L. (2016) · Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning · doi:10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.2 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Morton, T.
- Corresponding author
- Morton, Tom
- ORCID
- Morton, Tom
- Venue
- Critical Perspectives on Language Teaching Materials
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 2013
- Pages
- 111-136
- OpenAlex
- W2443778453
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 56.47
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Keywords
- CLIL, teaching materials, material selection, materials adaptation, materials design, material utilization, practitioner perspectives, second language teaching, English as a foreign language, English as a lingua franca, curriculum integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review