Cited by 52Second Language Learning and TeachingEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningMultilingual Education and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Critically Evaluating Materials for CLIL: Practitioners’ Practices and Perspectives

Morton, Tom·2013·Critical Perspectives on Language Teaching Materials

Abstract

This chapter presents a critical perspective on materials selection, adaptation, design, use and content in one second language education context, content and language integrated learning, or CLIL. CLIL is an educational approach in which curriculum subjects are taught through a language which is not the one normally used by teachers and students. Although any language can be used in CLIL or related approaches such as immersion, 1 English has become the dominant language to the extent that it has been suggested that a more accurate acronym might be CEIL — content and English integrated learning (Dalton-Puffer et al., 2010). Indeed, in terms of English language education, Graddol (2006) predicts that CLIL, along with the teaching of English to young learners and English as a lingua franca will be the dominant trend and will eventually replace English as a foreign language. The implementation of CLIL where it involves substantial teaching of non-language subject matter through a foreign language goes well beyond the introduction of new language teaching methodologies or approaches. It involves a ‘reculturing’ (Fullan, 2007) of not only the field of language teaching, but right across the curriculum as non-language subjects are involved. This reculturing affects all components of the system, and educational materials are central to this. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algor…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/9781137384263_6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Morton, T.
Corresponding author
Morton, Tom
Venue
Critical Perspectives on Language Teaching Materials
Published
2013
Pages
111-136
OpenAlex
W2443778453
Cited by
52
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
56.47
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
Keywords
CLIL, teaching materials, material selection, materials adaptation, materials design, material utilization, practitioner perspectives, second language teaching, English as a foreign language, English as a lingua franca, curriculum integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review