CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 168Social Capital and NetworksPolitical Theory and DemocracyElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trust, Democracy and Governance: Can Government Policies Influence Generalized Trust?

Uslaner, Eric M.·2003·Generating Social Capital
DOI 10.1057/9781403979544_9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

S ome years ago the noted novelist E. M. Forster (1965, 70) gave “Two Cheers for Democracy”: “… one because it admits variety and two because it permits criticism. Two cheers are quite enough: there is no occasion to give three. Only Love the Beloved Republic deserves that.” Perhaps there is a reason for a third cheer. Democratic societies are trusting societies. The big pay-off from generalized trust, most contemporary observers say, is that it leads to “better” government and to a public that is happier with government performance. Or maybe good government makes people more likely to trust each other. Or perhaps both. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/9781403979544_9

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 45 references

5 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Esposito, J. (1991). Islam and Politics, third ed. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
  2. Fenno, R. F. (1978). Home Style. Boston: Little, Brown.
  3. Gastil, R. D. (1991). “The Comparative Survey of Freedom: Experience and Suggestions,” in A. Inkeles (ed.), On Measuring Democracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  4. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-Silanes, A. Schleifer and R. Vishney (1997). “Trust in Large Organizations.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 87, 333–338.
  5. Levi, M. (1999). “When Good Defenses Make Good Neighbors: A Transaction Cost Approach to Trust and Distrust.” New York: Russell Sage Foundation Working Paper no. 140.
  6. Lipset, S. M. (1990). Continental Divide. New York: Routledge.
  7. Misztal, B. (1996). Trust in Modern Societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  8. Mueller, J. (1996). “Democracy, Capitalism, and the End of Transition,” In M. Mandlebaum, (ed.), Post-Communism: Four Perspectives. Washington: Council on Foreign Relations.
  9. Offe, C. (1999). “Trust and Knowledge, Rules and Decisions: Exploring a Difficult Conceptual Terrain,” in M. Warren (ed.), Democracy and Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Pagden, A. (1988). “The Destruction of Trust and its Economic Consequences in the Case of Eighteenth-century Naples,” in D. Gambetta (ed.), Trust. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  11. Vanhanen, T. (1997). Prospects of Democracy. New York: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–168 of 168

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Uslaner, E. M.
Corresponding author
Uslaner, Eric M.
Venue
Generating Social Capital
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan US
Published
2003
Pages
171-190
DOI
10.1057/9781403979544_9
OpenAlex
W2342256850
Cited by
168
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.91
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
generalized trust, democracy, governance, public policy, public trust in government, government performance, social trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review