The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Latent Semantic Analysis: five methodological recommendations
Open accessAbstract
The recent influx in generation, storage, and availability of textual data presents researchers with the challenge of developing suitable methods for their analysis. Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), a member of a family of methodological approaches that offers an opportunity to address this gap by describing the semantic content in textual data as a set of vectors, was pioneered by researchers in psychology, information retrieval, and bibliometrics. LSA involves a matrix operation called singular value decomposition, an extension of principal component analysis. LSA generates latent semantic dimensions that are either interpreted, if the researcher's primary interest lies with the understanding of the thematic structure in the textual data, or used for purposes of clustering, categorization, and predictive modeling, if the interest lies with the conversion of raw text into numerical data, as a precursor to subsequent analysis. This paper reviews five methodological issues that need to be addressed by the researcher who will embark on LSA. We examine the dilemmas, present the choices, and discuss the considerations under which good methodological decisions are made. We illustrate these issues with the help of four small studies, involving the analysis of abstracts for papers published in the European Journal of Information Systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944937 · Cited by 32,337
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
(2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-19715-5 · Cited by 25,437
Indexing by latent semantic analysis
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::aid-asi1>3.0.co;2-9 · Cited by 12,751
Introduction to information retrieval
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2715 · Cited by 12,278
Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis.
Johnson, A. R., & Wichern, D. W. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531616 · Cited by 11,353
Introduction to Information Retrieval
Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809071 · Cited by 11,288
Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval
Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1988) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/0306-4573(88)90021-0 · Cited by 9,740
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
An algorithm for suffix stripping
Porter, M. F. (1980) · Program · doi:10.1108/eb046814 · Cited by 8,096
Cited by
A Data-Driven Analysis of Workers' Earnings on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Hara, K., Adams, A., Milland, K., Savage, S., Callison-Burch, C., & Bigham, J. P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174023 · Cited by 497
Virtual Work Meetings during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Good, Bad, and Ugly
Karl, K. A., Peluchette, J. V., & Aghakhani, N. (2022) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/10464964211015286 · Cited by 375
Günther, F., Rinaldi, L., & Marelli, M. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619861372 · Cited by 341
Family Firm Heterogeneity: A Definition, Common Themes, Scholarly Progress, and Directions Forward
Daspit, J. J., Chrisman, J. J., Ashton, T., & Evangelopoulos, N. (2021) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/08944865211008350 · Cited by 336
Self-citationPatterns and trends in Building Information Modeling (BIM) research: A Latent Semantic Analysis
Yalcinkaya, M., & Singh, V. (2015) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.012 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Evangelopoulos, N., Zhang, X., & Prybutok, V. R.
- Venue
- European Journal of Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 70-86
- ISSN
- 0960-085X (ISSN-L)
- 1476-9344
- OpenAlex
- W2005406133
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 46.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Latent Semantic Analysis: five methodological recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/ejis.2010.61
- The paper
- Evangelopoulos, N., Zhang, X., & Prybutok, V. R. (2012). Latent Semantic Analysis: five methodological recommendations. European Journal of Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.61
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.