Cited by 281Technology Adoption and User BehaviourGender and Technology in EducationPersonality Traits and Psychology

Five-factor model personality traits as predictors of perceived and actual usage of technology

Barnett, Tim, Pearson, Allison W, Pearson, Rodney, Kellermanns, Franz W·2015·European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

Understanding the adoption and use of technology is extremely important in the field of information systems. Not surprisingly, there are several conceptual models that attempt to explain how and why individuals use technology. Until recently, however, the role of personality in general, and the five-factor model (FFM) of personality in particular, had remained largely unexplored. Our study takes an interactional psychology perspective, linking components of the FFM to the use of technology within the conceptual framework of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). After empirically confirming previous research findings linking performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence to technology use, we test direct relationships between FFM personality traits and technology use in the context of a web-based classroom technological system, utilizing measures of perceived and actual use of technology. Consistent with expectations, conscientiousness and neuroticism are associated with perceived and actual use of technology, with conscientiousness demonstrating a positive association with both perceived and actual use and neuroticism, a negative association. Extraversion was also significantly associated with actual use, although not in the positive direction expected. Further, the significant relationships between the personality traits and the actual use of technology were direct and not mediated by expressed intentions to use the system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/ejis.2014.10

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 108 · Cited by 281

Authors
Barnett, T., Pearson, A. W., Pearson, R., & Kellermanns, F. W.
Affiliations
  • Mississippi State University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
Venue
European Journal of Information Systems
Published
2015-07
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
374-390
ISSN
  • 0960-085X (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-9344
OpenAlex
W2092471107
Cited by
281
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5
FWCI
18.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
five-factor model of personality, personality traits, technology use, technology acceptance, UTAUT, conscientiousness, neuroticism, extraversion, actual use, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, technology adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review