Five-factor model personality traits as predictors of perceived and actual usage of technology
Abstract
Understanding the adoption and use of technology is extremely important in the field of information systems. Not surprisingly, there are several conceptual models that attempt to explain how and why individuals use technology. Until recently, however, the role of personality in general, and the five-factor model (FFM) of personality in particular, had remained largely unexplored. Our study takes an interactional psychology perspective, linking components of the FFM to the use of technology within the conceptual framework of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). After empirically confirming previous research findings linking performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence to technology use, we test direct relationships between FFM personality traits and technology use in the context of a web-based classroom technological system, utilizing measures of perceived and actual use of technology. Consistent with expectations, conscientiousness and neuroticism are associated with perceived and actual use of technology, with conscientiousness demonstrating a positive association with both perceived and actual use and neuroticism, a negative association. Extraversion was also significantly associated with actual use, although not in the positive direction expected. Further, the significant relationships between the personality traits and the actual use of technology were direct and not mediated by expressed intentions to use the system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study on personality traits found significant correlations between behavioral intention to use a technology and conscientiousness (r = 0.15, p < .05) and agreeableness (γ = 0.29, p < .05).
“a study on personality traits as predictors of perceived and actual usage of technology (59) found significant correlations between behavioral intention to use a technology and conscientiousness (r = 0.15, p < .05) and agreeableness (γ = 0.29, p < .05).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 108 · Cited by 281
- Authors
- Barnett, T., Pearson, A. W., Pearson, R., & Kellermanns, F. W.
- Affiliations
- Mississippi State University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
- Venue
- European Journal of Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 374-390
- ISSN
- 0960-085X (ISSN-L)
- 1476-9344
- OpenAlex
- W2092471107
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 18.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- five-factor model of personality, personality traits, technology use, technology acceptance, UTAUT, conscientiousness, neuroticism, extraversion, actual use, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, technology adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review