The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contextualizing Feminism — Gender, Ethnic and Class Divisions
Abstract
'Sisterhood is powerful.' 'Sisterhood' can also be misleading unless contextualized. Black, minority and migrant women have been on the whole invisible within the feminist movement in Britain and within the literature on women's or feminist studies. This paper attempts to explore the issue of the interrelationship of ethnic and gender divisions. ' Not only is such an attempt long overdue theoretically but it also raises political issues which must be central to feminist struggie. Our analysis serves to problematize the notion of'sisterhood' and the implicit feminist assumption that there exists a commonality of interests and/or goals amongst all women. Rather we argue that euery feminist struggle has a specific ethnic (as well as class) context. Although the notion of the 'ethnic' will be considered later in the paper we note here that for us it primarily relates to the exclusionary/inclusionary boundaries of collectivities formed round the notion of a common origin.2 The 'ethnic' context of feminist struggles has been systematically ignored (except in relation to various minorities, especially 'black') and we suggest this has helped to perpetuate both political and theoretical inadequacies within feminist and socialist analyses. The black feminist movement has grown partly as a response to the invisibility of black women and to the racism of the white feminist movement. Recently several books have appeared, mostly American which discuss blackwomen and feminism. Bell Hooks puts her case against white feminism clearly when she states:
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-15881-2 · Cited by 3,981
The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State
Engels, F., & Untermann, E. (2021) · Politics and Kinship · doi:10.4324/9781003003595-17 · Cited by 2,704
Social Insurance and Allied Services
B., A. G., & Beveridge, W. (1943) · International Affairs Review Supplement · doi:10.2307/3026316 · Cited by 1,305
Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism
Kennedy, L., Lapidus, J., & Eisenstein, Z. (1980) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3177483 · Cited by 677
hooks, B. (1981) · Cited by 243
Wilson, E. B. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203479261 · Cited by 148
Some Notes on Female Wage Labour in Capitalist Production
Beechey, V. (1977) · Capital & Class · doi:10.1177/030981687700300103 · Cited by 147
Cheerleaders and ombudsmen: the sociology of race relations in Britain
Bourne, J., & Sivanandan, A. (1980) · Race & Class · doi:10.1177/030639688002100401 · Cited by 72
What Is to Be Done About Violence Against Women
Wilson, E. J. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 60
Marxism and the concept of racism1
Gabriel, J., & Ben‐Tovim, G. (1978) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085147800000009 · Cited by 34
Cited by
Davis, K. (2008) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700108086364 · Cited by 2,539
Gender: An Intersectionality Perspective
Shields, S. A. (2008) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8 · Cited by 1,509
Forget Cultural Competence; Ask for an Autobiography
Hollinsworth, D. (2013) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/02615479.2012.730513 · Cited by 64
Complexities and Complications: Intersections of Class and Sexuality
Taylor, Y. (2010) · Theorizing Intersectionality and Sexuality · doi:10.1057/9780230304093_3 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N.
- Venue
- Feminist Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1983-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62-75
- ISSN
- 0141-7789 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4380
- OpenAlex
- W2036576231
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 8.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contextualizing Feminism — Gender, Ethnic and Class Divisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/fr.1983.33
- The paper
- Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1983). Contextualizing Feminism — Gender, Ethnic and Class Divisions. Feminist Review. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1983.33
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.