CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Reproductive Health and ContraceptionHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesInternational Human Rights and Reproductive Law

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

God's Bullies: Attacks on Abortion

Hadley, Janet·1994·Feminist Review
DOI 10.1057/fr.1994.44
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

National politics in the US, Poland, and Ireland have in recent years been afire with debate over abortion. Conflicting abortion laws almost scuttled the reunification of Germany. This paper describes how the abortion debate took hold in post-Communist Poland and how the issue came to be so entrenched in US politics in the wake of the US Supreme Court's 1973 decision on abortion in the case of Roe vs. Wade. It focuses upon abortion mainly as a method of birth control which women have always sought when needed regardless of the procedure's legal status. The controversies and campaigns recorded and the ideas offered focus upon women's access to affordable, safe, and legal abortion. The author argues that Poland is no place to be a woman and presents sections on the country's church, government, and medical profession; Roe vs. Wade; who opposes abortion rights and their broad success; the 1992 US presidential election; Bill Clinton's presidency; why the abortion debate has been different in Britain; and new issues on abortion.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/fr.1994.44

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. ALAN GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE, 1993, Abortion in the United States: Facts in Brief
  2. Berer Marge, 1993, Progress Postponed: Abortion in Europe in the 1990s
  3. Blanchard D., 1993, Religious Violence and Abortion
  4. Doyal Lesley, 1994, What Makes Women Sick: Gender and the Politics of Health
  5. Einhorn Barbara, 1993, Everywoman
  6. Faludi Susan, 1992, Backlash
  7. Gold Rachel Benson, 1990, Abortion and Women's Health: the Turning Point for America
  8. 10.2307/1395146 · DOI
  9. Hoell S., 1993, Reuters
  10. Retting E., 1986, The New Politics of Abortion
  11. Kissling Frances, 1992, Planned Parent- hood in Europe, 21, 18
  12. McKEEGAN Michelle, 1992, Mutiny in the Ranks of the Right
  13. Mrugala G., 1991, Planned Parenthood in Europe, 20, 4
  14. Petchesky Rosalind, 1984, Abortion and Woman's Choice

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hadley, J.
Corresponding author
Hadley, Janet
Venue
Feminist Review
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1994-11
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
94-113
ISSN
  • 0141-7789 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4380
DOI
10.1057/fr.1994.44
OpenAlex
W2043987839
Cited by
5
References
12
Citations by year
2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Feminist Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Keywords
abortion, abortion politics, abortion law, Roe v. Wade, Poland, Ireland, contraception, medical profession, post-communist Poland, Bill Clinton, abortion rights
MeSH terms
Abortion, Induced, Americas, Europe, Europe, Eastern, Family Planning Services, Legislation as Topic, North America, Poland, Politics, Public Opinion, United States, Developed Countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: God's Bullies: Attacks on Abortion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/fr.1994.44
The paper
Hadley, J. (1994). God's Bullies: Attacks on Abortion. Feminist Review. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1994.44