Identifying Generative Mechanisms through Affordances: A Framework for Critical Realist Data Analysis
Abstract
Critical realism has attracted increasing attention as an alternative to positivist and interpretive research for explaining contemporary phenomena. There are now several sources for information systems' (IS) scholars providing guidance on conducting critical realist studies. However, the most challenging step of a critical realist data analysis, the identification of causal mechanisms, is still insufficiently described. Identifying mechanisms is challenging. Drawing on the concept of affordances as an analytical construct offers the researcher a tool to identify and analyse mechanisms. We present a stepwise framework for identifying structural components of a mechanism, how these components interact to produce an outcome and contextual influences on this outcome. We illustrate the application of the framework through an example of the identification of IS innovation mechanisms in a case study in the airline industry. In doing so, we argue that the approach offers a methodological tool for identifying generative mechanisms, helping the researcher in conducting a more precise data analysis in empirical research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among affordances on different levels of granularity, dependencies and interactions may occur.
“Among these affordances on different levels of granularity, dependencies and interactions may occur, e.g., the potential of analyzing data requires having realized the potential of collecting data (Bygstad et al. 2016;Glowalla et al. 2014;Strong et al. 2014).”
From How affordances of chatbots cross the chasm between social and traditional enterprise systems (2020) · cites this paper as Bygstad et al. 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 257
- Authors
- Bygstad, B., Munkvold, B. E., & Volkoff, O.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- University of Agder (NO)
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Bygstad, Bendik
- Venue
- Journal of Information Technology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-96
- ISSN
- 0268-3962 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4437
- OpenAlex
- W1171508543
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 43.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
- Keywords
- critical realism, causal mechanisms, affordances, generative mechanisms, airline industry, contextual factors, information systems research methodology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review