Cited by 257Information Systems Theories and ImplementationCritical Realism in SociologyQualitative Comparative Analysis Research

Identifying Generative Mechanisms through Affordances: A Framework for Critical Realist Data Analysis

Bygstad, Bendik, Munkvold, Bjørn Erik, Volkoff, Olga·2016·Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

Critical realism has attracted increasing attention as an alternative to positivist and interpretive research for explaining contemporary phenomena. There are now several sources for information systems' (IS) scholars providing guidance on conducting critical realist studies. However, the most challenging step of a critical realist data analysis, the identification of causal mechanisms, is still insufficiently described. Identifying mechanisms is challenging. Drawing on the concept of affordances as an analytical construct offers the researcher a tool to identify and analyse mechanisms. We present a stepwise framework for identifying structural components of a mechanism, how these components interact to produce an outcome and contextual influences on this outcome. We illustrate the application of the framework through an example of the identification of IS innovation mechanisms in a case study in the airline industry. In doing so, we argue that the approach offers a methodological tool for identifying generative mechanisms, helping the researcher in conducting a more precise data analysis in empirical research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/jit.2015.13

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among affordances on different levels of granularity, dependencies and interactions may occur.

    “Among these affordances on different levels of granularity, dependencies and interactions may occur, e.g., the potential of analyzing data requires having realized the potential of collecting data (Bygstad et al. 2016;Glowalla et al. 2014;Strong et al. 2014).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 257

Authors
Bygstad, B., Munkvold, B. E., & Volkoff, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • University of Agder (NO)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Bygstad, Bendik
Venue
Journal of Information Technology
Published
2016-03
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
83-96
ISSN
  • 0268-3962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4437
OpenAlex
W1171508543
Cited by
257
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5
FWCI
43.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Information Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Keywords
critical realism, causal mechanisms, affordances, generative mechanisms, airline industry, contextual factors, information systems research methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review