Cited by 32Gender, Feminism, and MediaBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesMedia, Gender, and Advertising

“Digitized Dysmorphia” of the female body: the re/disfigurement of the image

Open access
Coy-Dibley, Isabelle·2016·Palgrave Communications

Abstract

What has the digitization of female appearances, the altering of female bodies not only in media but individually among the general public through the use of apps, done to human sexual interactions and senses of self? Western society’s booming beauty and sex industries have hyper-sexualised society, over-selling the female image as a currency and commodity of desire. Yet, media no longer has exclusive power over regulating representations of female aesthetics. Nowadays, particularly in Western culture, we can digitally alter ourselves through Photoshop and apps such as Perfect365, producing our own notions of normativity. Not only do we critique our bodies in mirrors, but now we can digitize our dysmorphia by virtually modifying what we dislike, creating “perfect” selves instead. How do these online ideal images affect women’s relationships to their material bodies, do these digital images provide the freedom to express a self that would otherwise be overlooked or simply accentuate the disparity between female bodies and the images women feel they must embody? In positing the new term of “Digitised Dysmorphia”, I question whether transforming oneself into a virtual ideal, manipulating the image, is an act of dissidence, or a demonstration of how fully regulated we are by social norms, whereby digital modifications simply enable us to reach normative ideals. Alternatively, perhaps this enablement irrevocably changes definitions of “normativity” as we alter our relations to the body and image. Ultimately, this article offers an initial exploration into how this digitized dsymorphia affects our perception of self individually and as a collective society. This article is published as part of a collection dedicated to multi- and interdisciplinary perspectives on gender studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/palcomms.2016.40

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Bordo S (1993) Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture and the Body. University of California Press: Berkeley.
  2. Davis K (1995) Reshaping the Female Body: The Dilemma of Cosmetic Surgery. Routledge: London.
  3. Doane MA (1982) Film and the masquerade: Theorising the female spectator. Screen; 23 (3-4): 74-88.
  4. Dobson AS (2007) Femininities as commodities: Cam girl culture. In: Harris A (ed). Next Wave Cultures: Feminism, Subcultures, Activism. Routledge: New York.
  5. Dobson AS (2014) Performative shamelessness on young women's social network sites: Shielding the self and resisting gender melancholia. Feminism & Psychology; 24 (1): 97-114.
  6. Fahs B (2014) "Freedom to" and "freedom from": A new vision for sex-positive politics. Sexualities; 17 (3): 267-290.
  7. Grogan S (2008) Body Image: Understanding Body Dissatisfaction in Men, Women and Children, 2nd edn, Routledge: London.
  8. Irigaray L (1985) This Sex Which is Not One; trans. C Porter and C Burke. Cornell University Press: New York.
  9. Law J (2009) Assembling the world by survey: Performativity and politics. Cultural Sociology; 3 (2): 239-256.
  10. O'Riordan K (2007) Technologized bodies: Virtual women and transformations in understandings of the body as natural. In: Hargreaves J and Vertinsky P (eds). Physical Culture, Power, and the Body. Routledge: New York.
  11. Phillips KA (1998) The Broken Mirror: Understanding and Treating Body Dysmorphic Disorder. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
  12. Riviere J (1929) Womanliness as Masquerade. International Journal of Psycho- analysis; 10: 303-313.
  13. Turner BS (2008) The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory, 3rd edn, Sage Publications: London.
  14. Wajcman J (2006) TechnoFeminism. Polity Press: Cambridge.
  15. Whitty M and Carr A (eds) (2006) Cyberspace Romance: The Psychology of Online Relationships. Palgrave Macmillan: New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coy-Dibley, I.
Corresponding author
Coy-Dibley, Isabelle
Venue
Palgrave Communications
Published
2016-07-05
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
2055-1045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2522428355
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Keywords
female body, body dysmorphic disorder, beauty industry, self-image, normativity, social media, Adobe Photoshop, self-presentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review