The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Qualitative Research to Validate the RQ-Dimensions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Crises can disrupt the relationship between an organization and its stakeholders, negatively impacting organizational reputation and influencing key variables such as credibility, sales performance, and consumer perceptions of product quality (Carmeli and Tishler 2005; Coombs 2007; Groenland 2002).”
From Artificial Intelligence in Crisis Communication: Investigating Source Effects and Matched Crisis Responses on Stakeholder Perceptions (2026) · cites this paper as Groenland 2002
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: scale development and validation
Walsh, G., & Beatty, S. E. (2007) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0015-7 · Cited by 899
Barakat Ali, M. A. (2022) · International Business Research · doi:10.5539/ibr.v15n7p30 · Cited by 7
Schneider, E., Kyriakopoulos, V., Seo, Y., Hong, N., Lee, M., & Lim, J. S. (2026) · Corporate Reputation Review · doi:10.1057/s41299-026-00254-9 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Groenland, E. A. G.
- Venue
- Corporate Reputation Review
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 308-315
- ISSN
- 1363-3589
- 1479-1889
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
