The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Project Risk Management: Processes, Techniques and Insights
Abstract
Based on sound conceptual foundations yet developed to meet practical concerns, Project Risk Management has become recognized as a standard work on its subject. It sets out the key issues and concepts involved in effective risk and uncertainty management in a clear and accessible way, providing a comprehensive discussion of risk management processes set firmly in the context of the project management task as a whole and focused on improving performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Current practice in project management — an empirical study
White, D., & Fortune, J. (2002) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(00)00029-6 · Cited by 705
A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment
Nieto-Morote, A., & Ruz-Vila, F. (2011) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.02.002 · Cited by 464
Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence
de Bakker, K., Boonstra, A., & Wortmann, H. (2010) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.07.002 · Cited by 332
Impact of risk management on project performance: the importance of soft skills
Carvalho, M. M. D., & Rabechini Junior, R. (2015) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.919423 · Cited by 324
Identifying and assessing critical risk factors for BIM projects: Empirical study
Chien, K.-F., Wu, Z.-H., & Huang, S.-C. (2014) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2014.04.012 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, J. U. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the Operational Research Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 769-770
- ISSN
- 0160-5682 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-9360
- OpenAlex
- W1988385300
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Project Risk Management: Processes, Techniques and Insights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600022
- The paper
- Smith, J. U. M. (1998). Project Risk Management: Processes, Techniques and Insights. Journal of the Operational Research Society. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
