The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An EOQ model for deteriorating items with time varying demand and partial backlogging
Abstract
In the classical economic order quantity model, it is often assumed that the shortages are either completely backlogged or completely lost. However, in some inventory systems, it is more reasonable to assume that the backlogging rate is dependent on the length of the waiting time for the next replenishment. The longer the waiting time is, the smaller the backlogging rate would be. In this paper, we focus on the effect of the backlogging rate on the economic order quantity decision. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent trends in modeling of deteriorating inventory
Goyal, S. K., & Giri, B. C. (2001) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(00)00248-4 · Cited by 1,323
State-of-the-art literature review on inventory models for perishable products
Chaudhary, V., Kulshrestha, R., & Routroy, S. (2018) · Journal of Advances in Management Research · doi:10.1108/jamr-09-2017-0091 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, H.-J., & Dye, C.-Y.
- Venue
- Journal of the Operational Research Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1176-1182
- ISSN
- 0160-5682 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-9360
- OpenAlex
- W1995342995
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An EOQ model for deteriorating items with time varying demand and partial backlogging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600801
- The paper
- Chang, H.-J., & Dye, C.-Y. (1999). An EOQ model for deteriorating items with time varying demand and partial backlogging. Journal of the Operational Research Society. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
