Cited by 482Simulation Techniques and ApplicationsComplex Systems and Decision MakingSimulation and Modeling Applications

Conceptual modelling for simulation Part I: definition and requirements

Open access
Robinson, S·2008·Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Conceptual modelling is probably the most important aspect of a simulation study. It is also the most difficult and least understood. Over 40 years of simulation research and practice have provided only limited information on how to go about designing a simulation conceptual model. This paper, the first of two, discusses the meaning of conceptual modelling and the requirements of a conceptual model. Founded on existing literature, a definition of a conceptual model is provided. Four requirements of a conceptual model are described: validity, credibility, utility and feasibility. The need to develop the simplest model possible is also discussed. Owing to a paucity of advice on how to design a conceptual model, the need for a conceptual modelling framework is proposed. Built on the foundations laid in this paper, a conceptual modelling framework is described in the paper that follows.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602368

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For simulation studies, the research question typically forms the starting point of the modeling and simulation life cycle and is key to interpreting its outputs such as simulation data or a simulation model.

    “For simulation studies, it typically forms the starting point of the modeling and simulation life cycle [1, 67] and is key to interpreting its outputs such as simulation data or a simulation model.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 79 · Cited by 482

Authors
Robinson, S.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Robinson, S
Venue
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Published
2008-03
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
278-290
ISSN
  • 0160-5682 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-9360
OpenAlex
W1997875983
Cited by
482
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 29
FWCI
26.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Operational Research Society (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Simulation and Modeling Applications
Keywords
conceptual modeling, simulation modelling, model validity, model credibility, model utility, model feasibility, model simplicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review