Cited by 39Public Relations and Crisis CommunicationCorporate Identity and ReputationDigital Marketing and Social Media

Exploring Corporate Reputation and Crisis Communication

Open access
Nuortimo, Kalle, Harkonen, Janne, Breznik, Kristijan·2026·Journal of Marketing Analytics

Abstract

Corporate reputation, the collective perception of company attractiveness towards stakeholders, impacts business outcomes, while effective communication strategies play a critical role in shaping and maintaining the reputation. The role of communication is highlighted during crises, crisis communication being a strategic approach to managing and mitigating the impact of unexpected or adverse events on the reputation, operations, and stakeholders. These concepts are deeply interrelated with interactive marketing. This study explores the dynamics of corporate reputation and crisis communication during a recent global crisis by combining a literature review, opinion mining, and classification analysis. This is because stakeholders rely on various information sources and engage in online discussions, which can impact the reputation, and pose new challenges. The opinion mining analysis draws from the media communication of selected stock-listed companies during a crisis. The key findings shed light on the dynamics of corporate reputation and crisis communication and the impacts on interactive marketing. Critical components of crisis communication are identified to include monitoring, tactics of responding, and response management. Linkages between these, crisis communication theories, and corporate reputation are synthesised. Indications are provided on how the crisis can affect the corporate reputation and the significance of the speed of preventive communication measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41270-024-00353-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A multicenter clinical database study demonstrated the effectiveness of semi-automated assessments in detecting widespread issues, while minimal manual checks remained necessary to address errors missed by automation.

    “A multicenter clinical database study demonstrated the effectiveness of semi-automated assessments in detecting widespread issues, while minimal manual checks remained necessary to address errors missed by automation [86].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nuortimo, K., Harkonen, J., & Breznik, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • International School for Social and Business Studies (SI)
Corresponding author
Nuortimo, Kalle
Venue
Journal of Marketing Analytics
Published
2024-10-03
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
4-25
ISSN
  • 2050-3318 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-3326
OpenAlex
W4403084432
Cited by
39
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 13
FWCI
32.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Marketing Analytics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Turku
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
corporate reputation, crisis communication, interactive marketing, stakeholder perspectives, sentiment analysis, online discourse, media communication, preventive communication, global crisis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review