Exploring Corporate Reputation and Crisis Communication
Open accessAbstract
Corporate reputation, the collective perception of company attractiveness towards stakeholders, impacts business outcomes, while effective communication strategies play a critical role in shaping and maintaining the reputation. The role of communication is highlighted during crises, crisis communication being a strategic approach to managing and mitigating the impact of unexpected or adverse events on the reputation, operations, and stakeholders. These concepts are deeply interrelated with interactive marketing. This study explores the dynamics of corporate reputation and crisis communication during a recent global crisis by combining a literature review, opinion mining, and classification analysis. This is because stakeholders rely on various information sources and engage in online discussions, which can impact the reputation, and pose new challenges. The opinion mining analysis draws from the media communication of selected stock-listed companies during a crisis. The key findings shed light on the dynamics of corporate reputation and crisis communication and the impacts on interactive marketing. Critical components of crisis communication are identified to include monitoring, tactics of responding, and response management. Linkages between these, crisis communication theories, and corporate reputation are synthesised. Indications are provided on how the crisis can affect the corporate reputation and the significance of the speed of preventive communication measures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A multicenter clinical database study demonstrated the effectiveness of semi-automated assessments in detecting widespread issues, while minimal manual checks remained necessary to address errors missed by automation.
“A multicenter clinical database study demonstrated the effectiveness of semi-automated assessments in detecting widespread issues, while minimal manual checks remained necessary to address errors missed by automation [86].”
From Data Quality in the Age of AI: A Review of Governance, Ethics, and the FAIR Principles (2025) · cites this paper as [86]
Cites
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x · Cited by 11,385 · see citing works
ChatGPT: five priorities for research
van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7 · Cited by 1,842 · see citing works
Can corporate social responsibility protect firm value during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Qiu, S. (., Jiang, J., Liu, X., Chen, M.-H., & Yuan, X. (2021) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102759 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Data Quality in the Age of AI: A Review of Governance, Ethics, and the FAIR Principles
Guillen-Aguinaga, M., Aguinaga-Ontoso, E., Guillen-Aguinaga, L., Guillen-Grima, F., & Aguinaga-Ontoso, I. (2025) · Data · doi:10.3390/data10120201 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nuortimo, K., Harkonen, J., & Breznik, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Turku (FI)
- International School for Social and Business Studies (SI)
- Corresponding author
- Nuortimo, Kalle
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Analytics
- Published
- 2024-10-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-25
- ISSN
- 2050-3318 (ISSN-L)
- 2050-3326
- OpenAlex
- W4403084432
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 13
- FWCI
- 32.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing Analytics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- University of Turku
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Keywords
- corporate reputation, crisis communication, interactive marketing, stakeholder perspectives, sentiment analysis, online discourse, media communication, preventive communication, global crisis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review