Knowledge Mapping and Evolution of Research on Older Adults’ Technology Acceptance: A Bibliometric Study from 2013 to 2023
Open accessAbstract
The rapid expansion of information technology and the intensification of population aging are two prominent features of contemporary societal development. Investigating older adults’ acceptance and use of technology is key to facilitating their integration into an information-driven society. Given this context, the technology acceptance of older adults has emerged as a prioritized research topic, attracting widespread attention in the academic community. However, existing research remains fragmented and lacks a systematic framework. To address this gap, we employed bibliometric methods, utilizing the Web of Science Core Collection to conduct a comprehensive review of literature on older adults’ technology acceptance from 2013 to 2023. Utilizing VOSviewer and CiteSpace for data assessment and visualization, we created knowledge mappings of research on older adults’ technology acceptance. Our study employed multidimensional methods such as co-occurrence analysis, clustering, and burst analysis to: (1) reveal research dynamics, key journals, and domains in this field; (2) identify leading countries, their collaborative networks, and core research institutions and authors; (3) recognize the foundational knowledge system centered on theoretical model deepening, emerging technology applications, and research methods and evaluation, uncovering seminal literature and observing a shift from early theoretical and influential factor analyses to empirical studies focusing on individual factors and emerging technologies; (4) moreover, current research hotspots are primarily in the areas of factors influencing technology adoption, human-robot interaction experiences, mobile health management, and aging-in-place technology, highlighting the evolutionary context and quality distribution of research themes. Finally, we recommend that future research should deeply explore improvements in theoretical models, long-term usage, and user experience evaluation. Overall, this study presents a clear framework of existing research in the field of older adults’ technology acceptance, providing an important reference for future theoretical exploration and innovative applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The United States leads in the number of publications on technology acceptance among older adults.
“In addition, the country leads in the number of publications on technology acceptance among older adults [42], further indicating its pace compared to other regions.”
From Smart Speakers for Health and Well-Being of Older Adults: A Mixed-Methods Review (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World
Pranckutė, R. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9010012 · Cited by 2,696 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Web of Science is a comprehensively recognized database in academia, featuring literature that has undergone rigorous peer review and editorial scrutiny (Lin and Yu 2024b; Mongeon and Paul-Hus 2016; Pranckut ė 2021).”
Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review
Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J. M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M. (2014) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004 · Cited by 1,206 · see citing works
Barnard, Y., Bradley, M. D., Hodgson, F., & Lloyd, A. D. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.006 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review
Yusif, S., Soar, J., & Hafeez-Baig, A. (2016) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.004 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
A review of technology acceptance by older adults
Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2011) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2011.10.01.006.00 · Cited by 353 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…adults, as a group with unique needs, exhibit different behavioral patterns during technology acceptance than other user groups, and these uniquenesses include changes in cognitive abilities, as well as motivations, attitudes, and perceptions of the use of new technologies (Chen and Chan 2011).”
Application Scenarios for Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care: Rapid Review
Seibert, K., Domhoff, D., Bruch, D., Schulte-Althoff, M., Fürstenau, D., Biessmann, F., & Wolf-Ostermann, K. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26522 · Cited by 314 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…big data technologies, these theoretical models have incorporated new variables such as perceived risk, trust, and privacy issues (Amin et al. 2024; Chen et al. 2024; Jing et al. 2024b; Seibert et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2024b), advancing the theoretical depth and empirical research in this fi eld.”
A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence chatbots in educational contexts
Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2024) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-12-2022-0165 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Vrijhoef, H. J. M., Nieboer, M. E., Aarts, S., van der Voort, C. S., Rijnaard, M. D., & Wouters, E. J. M. (2019) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1241-9 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smart Speakers for Health and Well-Being of Older Adults: A Mixed-Methods Review
Dino, M. J., Leinbach, C., Dino, G., Thiamwong, L., Villafuerte, C. M., Shattell, M., Pimentel, J., Zamora, M. A., Bautista, A., Vitug, J. P., et al. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13212772 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shang, X., Liu, Z., Gong, C., Hu, Z., Wu, Y., & Wang, C.
- Affiliations
- Shaanxi University of Science and Technology (CN)
- East China Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Chengliang
- Venue
- Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
- Published
- 2024-08-31
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2055-1045 (ISSN-L)
- 2662-9992
- OpenAlex
- W4402091190
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 31.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Social Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2023J014)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- older adults, technology acceptance, technology adoption, population aging, human-robot interaction, mobile health, aging in place, research trends, research collaboration networks, user experience evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review