The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distribution of Quadratic Forms in Normal Space—Application to Structural Reliability
Abstract
In second‐order reliability methods the failure surface in the standard normal space is approximated by a parabolic surface at the design point. The corresponding probability is computed by asymptotic formulas and by approximation formulas. In this paper the probability content of the parabolic failure domain is computed exactly by inversion of the characteristic function for the parabolic quadratic form. Also, the exact result for the probability content of the failure domain obtained from the full second‐order Taylor expansion of the failure function at the design point is presented. The approximating parabola does not depend on the formulation of the failure function as long as this preserves the original failure surface. This invariance characteristic is in general not shared by the approximation obtained using the full second‐order Taylor expansion of the failure function at the design point. The exact results for the probability content of the approximating quadratic domains significantly extend the class of problems that can be treated by approximate methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format
Hasofer, A. M., & Lind, N. C. (1974) · Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division · doi:10.1061/jmcea3.0001848 · Cited by 3,130
Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions.
Fisk, P. R., Johnson, N. L., & Kotz, S. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344756 · Cited by 1,543
Asymptotic Approximations for Multinormal Integrals
Breitung, K. (1984) · Journal of Engineering Mechanics · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1984)110:3(357 · Cited by 912
Second‐Order Reliability Approximations
Kiureghian, A. D., Lin, H., & Hwang, S. (1987) · Journal of Engineering Mechanics · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1987)113:8(1208 · Cited by 585
Non-Normal Dependent Vectors in Structural Safety
Hohenbichler, M., & Rackwitz, R. (1981) · Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division · doi:10.1061/jmcea3.0002777 · Cited by 576
Quadratic Limit States in Structural Reliability
Fiessler, B., Neumann, H.-J., & Rackwitz, R. (1979) · Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division · doi:10.1061/jmcea3.0002512 · Cited by 389
Distributions in statistics: Continuous univariate distributions
Rota, G. (1977) · Advances in Mathematics · doi:10.1016/0001-8708(77)90050-0 · Cited by 144
Cited by
Chojaczyk, A. A., Teixeira, A. P., Neves, L. C., Cardoso, J. B., & Guedes Soares, C. (2015) · Structural Safety · doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.09.002 · Cited by 391
Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis of Corroded Steel Beam
Nie, B., Xu, S., & Wang, Y. (2020) · KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12205-020-1478-z · Cited by 23
Structural Seismic Reliability Analysis
Sankararaman, S. (2014) · Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_280-1 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Tvedt, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Mechanics
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1183-1197
- ISSN
- 0733-9399 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7889
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1990)116:6(1183
- OpenAlex
- W2078001555
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 10.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution of Quadratic Forms in Normal Space—Application to Structural Reliability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1990)116:6(1183
- The paper
- Tvedt, L. (1990). Distribution of Quadratic Forms in Normal Space—Application to Structural Reliability. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1990)116%3A6(1183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.