The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determining Urban Storm Water BMP Effectiveness
Abstract
The goal of this U.S. EPA-funded cooperative research program with the ASCE is to develop a more useful set of data on the effectiveness of storm water best management practices (BMPs) used to reduce pollutant discharges from urban development. BMP monitoring data gathered at a particular site should not only be useful for that site, but also need to be useful for comparing the effectiveness of similar and different types of BMPs at other locations. Most BMP effectiveness studies in the past have provided data that is difficult, if not impossible, to use in comparing BMP design effectiveness and in the selection among individual BMP types to meet desired goals. This paper describes some of the comparability problems encountered between different BMP effectiveness studies. Also discussed are considerations that affect data transferability, such as methods used for determining efficiency and statistical significance. It outlines the efforts used to establish and analyze the currently available data and proposes protocols for future analyses, when more studies that have data are available. Finally, it recommends that effluent quality appears to be a much more robust measure of BMP efficiency than the currently used “percent removal” metrics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ruangpan, L., Vojinovic, Z., Di Sabatino, S., Leo, L. S., Capobianco, V., Oen, A. M. P., McClain, M. E., & Lopez-Gunn, E. (2020) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-20-243-2020 · Cited by 428
Field Performance of Bioretention: Water Quality
Davis, A. P. (2007) · Environmental Engineering Science · doi:10.1089/ees.2006.0190 · Cited by 306
Water quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention
Li, H., & Davis, A. P. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000026 · Cited by 238
Urban Stormwater Treatment Using Bioretention
Trowsdale, S. A., & Simcock, R. (2011) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.023 · Cited by 235
Gilbreath, A., McKee, L., Shimabuku, I., Lin, D., Werbowski, L. M., Zhu, X., Grbic, J., & Rochman, C. (2019) · Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment · doi:10.1061/jswbay.0000883 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Strecker, E. W., Quigley, M. M., Urbonas, B. R., Jones, J. E., & Clary, J. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 144-149
- ISSN
- 0733-9496 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5452
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2001)127:3(144
- OpenAlex
- W1983371393
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determining Urban Storm Water BMP Effectiveness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2001)127:3(144
- The paper
- Strecker, E. W., Quigley, M. M., Urbonas, B. R., Jones, J. E., & Clary, J. K. (2001). Determining Urban Storm Water BMP Effectiveness. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2001)127%3A3(144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.