Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 546

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Treatments for the Improvement of Recycled Aggregate

Katz, Amnon·2004·Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
DOI 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2004)16:6(597

Abstract

The microstructure of recycled aggregate prepared from the crushing of old concrete was studied. It was found that the recycled aggregate is covered with loose particles that may prevent good bonding between the new cement matrix and the recycled aggregate. The old cement paste that remained on the natural aggregate was porous and cracked, leading to weak mechanical properties of the recycled aggregate. Treatment of the recycled aggregate by impregnation of silica fume solution and by ultrasonic cleaning was studied with the objective of overcoming the above-mentioned limitations. An increase of ∼30 and ∼15% in the compressive strength at ages 7 and 28days was observed after the silica fume treatment. Ultrasonic treatment led to an improvement of ∼7%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2004)16:6(597)

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 546

Metadata

Authors
Katz, A.
Venue
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Published
2004-12
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
597-603
ISSN
  • 0899-1561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5533
DOI
10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2004)16:6(597
OpenAlex
W2012299702
Cited by
546
References
0
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatments for the Improvement of Recycled Aggregate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2004)16:6(597
The paper
Katz, A. (2004). Treatments for the Improvement of Recycled Aggregate. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2004)16%3A6(597

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.