The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Polyethylene Pipes
Abstract
Two types of polyethylene are used for pipeline systems: medium density polyethylene and high density polyethylene. A polyethylene pipe, being a thermoplastic, softens on heating and hardens on cooling. Because of the viscoelastic nature of polyethylene, stresses decrease under applied constant strain and strains increase under applied constant stress. To account for the complex behavior of polyethylene pipe, laboratory tests were performed to study its thermal and mechanical properties. This paper presents the test results, findings, and design recommendations for polyethylene pipe properties. The tests were performed in a temperature controlled room, where properties were investigated for thermal variations expected in the field. Two types of tests were performed: stress relaxation tests and temperature ramp tests. Test methods and properties are summarized for relaxation modulus, instantaneous modulus, Poisson’s ratio, thermal expansion/contraction coefficient, and stress relaxation rates.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bilgin et al [40] found that Poisson's ratio of the MDPE pipe at a strain rate close to 1000 µε min-1 (approximately 1.6 × 10-5 s-1) increased from 0.42 at -6.7 •C to 0.48 at 49 •C.”
Citations
Cited by
Sahputra, I. H., & Echtermeyer, A. T. (2013) · Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/0965-0393/21/6/065016 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Bilgin, Ö., Stewart, H. E., & O’Rourke, T. D.
- Affiliations
- Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-4003 (corresponding author).
- Venue
- Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
- Published
- 2007
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.