The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mathematical Modeling of Watershed Hydrology
Abstract
Mathematical modeling of watershed hydrology is employed to address a wide spectrum of environmental and water resources problems. A historical perspective of hydrologic modeling is provided, and new developments and challenges in watershed models are discussed. These include data acquisition by remote sensing and space technology, digital terrain and elevation models, chemical tracers, geographic information and data management systems, topographic representation, upscaling of hydrologic conservation equations, spatial variability of hydraulic roughness, infiltration and precipitation, spatial and temporal scaling, model calibration, and linking with water quality models. Model construction, calibration, and data processing have received a great deal of attention, while model validation, error propagation, and analyses of uncertainty, risk, and reliability have not been treated as thoroughly. Finally, some remarks are made regarding the future outlook for watershed hydrology modeling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., & Williams, J. R. (1998) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x · Cited by 7,945
BEVEN, K. J., & KIRKBY, M. J. (1979) · Hydrological Sciences Bulletin · doi:10.1080/02626667909491834 · Cited by 6,670
Cited by
POFF, N. L., RICHTER, B. D., ARTHINGTON, A. H., BUNN, S. E., NAIMAN, R. J., KENDY, E., ACREMAN, M., APSE, C., BLEDSOE, B. P., FREEMAN, M. C., et al. (2010) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x · Cited by 1,595
A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review
Hrachowitz, M., Savenije, H. H. G., Blöschl, G., McDonnell, J. J., Sivapalan, M., Pomeroy, J. W., Arheimer, B., Blume, T., Clark, M. P., Ehret, U., et al. (2013) · Hydrological Sciences Journal · doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.803183 · Cited by 1,295
Clark, M. P., Slater, A. G., Rupp, D. E., Woods, R. A., Vrugt, J. A., Gupta, H. V., Wagener, T., & Hay, L. E. (2008) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2007wr006735 · Cited by 638
Tang, Y., Reed, P., Wagener, T., & van Werkhoven, K. (2007) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-11-793-2007 · Cited by 422
Calibration of a distributed hydrological model based on satellite evapotranspiration
Immerzeel, W. W., & Droogers, P. (2008) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.017 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, V. P., & Woolhiser, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 270-292
- ISSN
- 1084-0699 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5584
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2002)7:4(270
- OpenAlex
- W2116397061
- Cited by
- 843
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mathematical Modeling of Watershed Hydrology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2002)7:4(270
- The paper
- Singh, V. P., & Woolhiser, D. A. (2002). Mathematical Modeling of Watershed Hydrology. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2002)7%3A4(270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
